Faculty and Student Perceptions of Open Pedagogy: A Case Study From British Columbia, Canada

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.2.40

Keywords:

open pedagogy, open educational practices, renewable assignments, perceptions of learning

Abstract

A transformation in teaching and learning happens when students move from being consumers to creators of knowledge. While there is a growing body of research available on the use of open education resources by faculty and students, there is comparatively little research available with regards to open pedagogy (OP) in higher education. The few studies that have explored the perceptions of OP have focused on one specific OP practice in a small context (one or two course sections). The present review study surveyed the perceptions of faculty and students at a Canadian university across several courses and a range of types of OP. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed students and faculty alike were positive about the benefits and impacts of engaging in OP, but each expressed challenges with needing greater time for OP. Additionally, while students experienced challenges with process, faculty experienced challenges with supports. Recommendations are provided for ways faculty can support students when engaging in OP and ways institutions can support faculty who engage in OP. Ultimately, knowing more about the experiences and perspectives of students and faculty could help inform the development of best practices for faculty who wish to use OP with students.

References

Al Abri, M.H., & Dabbagh, N. (2019). Testing the intervention of OER renewable assignments in a college course. Open Praxis, 11(2), 195–209. http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.2.916

Axe, J., Childs, E., DeVries, I., & Webster, K. (2020). Student experiences of open educational practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(4), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135340

Bali, M. (2019, June 14). The other side of student empowerment in a digital world #FOEcast – join me June 24 to chat. Reflecting allowed. https://blog.mahabali.me/uncategorized/the-other-side-of-student-empowerment-in-a-digital-world-foecast-join-me-june-24-to-chat/

Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R.S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 10. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565

Baran, E., & AlZoubi, D. (2020). Affordances, challenges, and impact of open pedagogy: Examining students’ voices. Distance Education, 41(2), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757409

Bliss, T.J., Robinson, T.J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D.A. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(4). http://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04

Bonica, M. J., Judge, R., Bernard, C., & Murphy, S. (2018). Open Pedagogy Benefits to Competency Development: From Sage on the Stage to Guy in the Audience. The Journal of Health Administration Education, 35(1), 9-27. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/aupha/jhae/2018/00000035/00000001/art00003

Borthwick, K., & Gallagher-Brett, A. (2014). Inspiration, ideas, encouragement: Teacher development and improved use of technology in language teaching through open educational practice. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818560

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Brown, M., & Croft, B. (2020). Social annotation and an inclusive praxis for open pedagogy in the college classroom. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 8. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.561

Brunton, J., & Gaffney, M. (2020, April 2). Exploring the influence of an open pedagogy assignment on online learner perceptions of knowledge production in society [Conference presentation]. OER20. https://youtu.be/Rp9KjC3wXtw?si=pfAMy5w0x-Wftk8U

CAST. (n.d.). The UDL guidelines. https://udlguidelines.cast.org/

Caulfield, M. (2016, September 7). Putting student-produced OER at the heart of the institution. Hapgood. https://hapgood.us/2016/09/07/putting-student-produced-oer-at-the-heart-of-the-institution/

Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publishing.

Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096

Dermody, R. (2019). Open pedagogy for teaching structures. Building Technology Educator's Society, 2019(3). https://doi.org/10.7275/s9xd-h436

DeRosa, R., & Jhangiani, R. (2017). Open pedagogy. In E. Mays (Ed.), A guide to making open textbooks with students. Rebus Community. https://press.rebus.community/makingopentextbookswithstudents/chapter/open-pedagogy/

DeRosa, R., & Robison, S. (2017). From OER to open pedagogy: Harnessing the power of open. In R. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.), Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. (pp. 115–124). Ubiquity Press. https://doi.org/10.5334/bbc.i

Dolan, K., & Lawless, J.L. (2020, May 7). It takes a submission: Gendered patterns in the pages of AJPS. American Journal of Political Science. https://ajps.org/2020/04/20/it-takes-a-submission-gendered-patterns-in-the-pages-of-ajps/

Farzan, R., & Kraut, R.E. (2013). Wikipedia classroom experiment: Bidirectional benefits of students’ engagement in online production communities. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470765

Flinn, C. (2020). Trades students’ perceptions of their experiences in the co-creation of OER [Master’s thesis, Royal Roads University]. http://dx.doi.org/10.25316/IR-15317

Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003

Gordon, L. (2017). Students as co-designers: Peer and instructional resources for novice users of ePortfolio. International Journal of ePortfolio, 7(2), 113–127. https://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP279.pdf

Gumb, L., & Miceli, H. (2020). Library support for scaffolding OER-enabled pedagogy in a general education science course. In A. Clifton &

K. Davies Hoffman (Eds.), Open pedagogy approaches: Faculty, library, and student collaborations. (pp. 173–189). Milne Publishing. https://milnepublishing.geneseo.edu/openpedagogyapproaches/

Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430383

Hilton, J., Hilton, B., Ikahihifo, T. K., Chaffee, R., Darrow, J., Guilmett, J., & Wiley, D. (2020). Identifying student perceptions of different instantiations of open pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4895

Hilton, J., III., Wiley, D., Chaffee, R., Darrow, J., Guilmett, J., Harper, S., & Hilton, B. (2019). Student perceptions of open pedagogy: An exploratory study. Open Praxis, 11(3), 275–288. http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.973

Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Paskevicius, M. (2012). The role of postgraduate students in co-authoring open educational resources to promote social inclusion: A case study at the University of Cape Town. Distance Education, 33(2), 253-269, https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.692052

Hollister, C.V. (2020). Using open pedagogy to engage LIS students: A case study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 8, 2357. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2357

Jung, E., Bauer, C., & Heaps, A. (2017). Higher education faculty perceptions of open textbook adoption. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3120

Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive openness in teacher practice. Teachers College Record, 118, 1–34. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309118315_Expansive_openness_in_teacher_practice

Kruger, J. S., & Hollister, C. (2021). Engaging undergraduate public health students through a textbook creation project. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 7(3), 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379920962416

Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU). (n.d.). Why choose KPU. Kwantlen Polytechnic University. https://www.kpu.ca/why-choose-kpu

Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU). (2021, April 13). Student profile: Students who studied in the 2019/20 academic year. Office of Planning & Accountability, Kwantlen Polytechnic University. https://www.kpu.ca/sites/default/files/Institutional%20Analysis%20and%20Planning/KPU%20Student%20Profile%20-%20April%2013%202021.pdf

Kwantlen Polytechnic University (KPU). (2018). Open education. Kwantlen Polytechnic University. https://www.kpu.ca/vp-academic/academic-plan-2023/open-education

Marsh, J. (2018, April 27). What open education taught me: A Keene State College undergraduate reflects on her experiences with open education. Open Pedagogy Notebook. http://openpedagogy.org/program-level/what-open-education-taught-me/

Maxwell, J.A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Paskevicius, M. & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2018). Student perceptions of the creation and reuse of digital educational resources in a community development-oriented organisation. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i1.253

Paskevicius, M., & Irvine, V. (2019). Open education and learning design: Open pedagogy in praxis. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019(1), 10. http://doi.org/10.5334/jime.512

Pinho-Gomes A.-C., Peters, S., Thompson, K., Hockham, C., Ripullone, K., Woodward, M., & Carcel, C. (2020). Where are the women? Gender inequalities in COVID-19 research authorship. BMJ Global Health, 5(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002922

Seraphin, S. B., Grizzell, J. A., Kerr-German, A., Perkins, M. A., Grzanka, P. R., & Hardin, E. E. (2019). A conceptual framework for non-disposable assignments: Inspiring implementation, innovation, and research. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718811711

Weller, M. (2013). The battle for open - a perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(3), 15. http://doi.org/10.5334/2013-15

Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). Exploring student perceptions as co-authors of course material. Open Praxis, 13, 53-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.1.1187

Wiley, D. (n.d.). Defining the "open" in open content and open educational resources.

Wiley, D. (2013, October 21). What is open pedagogy. Improving learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/2975

Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. L., III. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Ashman, M. (2023). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Open Pedagogy: A Case Study From British Columbia, Canada. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 3(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.2.40

Issue

Section

Research Articles