Reconsidering the Mandatory in Ontario Online Learning Policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2021.1.2.12Keywords:
mandatory online learning, online learning, critical policy analysis, k-12 education, technology-enabled education, emergency remote teachingAbstract
In March 2019, the Ontario government announced that commencing in 2023-24, secondary school students (Grades 9-12) would be required to gain four of 30 graduation credits through online courses. At the time of the policy pronouncement, these four credits (or courses) would become the first mandatory online courses in Canadian K-12 education. The policy decision and process were challenged publicly, and the educational context changed quickly with the ensuing contingencies of the global pandemic. The policy was subsequently revised and, at present, Ontario requires two mandatory online secondary school credits for graduation, which is twice the requirement of any other North American jurisdiction. In this study, the researchers employ a critical policy analysis framework to examine the concept of mandatory online learning in Ontario through multiple temporal contexts. First, they examine Ontario’s mandatory online learning policy prior to the shutdown of Ontario schools during the 2020-2021 global pandemic. Next, they examine aspects of Ontario’s mandatory online learning policy in K-12 during the emergency remote learning phase of the pandemic. In the final section, the authors provide a retrospective analysis of the decisions around mandatory e-learning policy and explore policy options going forward for mandatory e-learning in the K-12 sector post-pandemic.
References
Abraham, C. (2021, April 8). Letter to the Minister of Education, Ontario. https://www.opsba.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/OPSBA-Letter-to-Minister-Lecce-re-Remote-Learning-Proposal.pdf
Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and poststructural approach. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., Braun, A., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Policy actors: Doing policy work in schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 625¬–639. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.601565
Barbour, M. K., & LaBonte, R. (2019). Sense of irony or perfect timing: Examining the research supporting proposed e-learning changes in Ontario. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(2). http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1137/1736
Barbour, M. K., LaBonte, R., Kelly, K., Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., Bond, A., & Hill, P. (2020, December). Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online teaching. State of the Nation: K-12 E-Learning in Canada. https://k12sotn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/understanding-pandemic-pedagogy.pdf
Bates, T. (2018, December 20). Summary of the 2018 survey of online learning in Canadian colleges and universities. https://www.tonybates.ca/2018/12/20/summary-of-the-2018-survey-of-online-learning-in-canadian-colleges-and-universities/
British Columbia Teachers’ Federation (2017, August). Priorities for public education: A brief to the Ministry of Education from the BC Teachers’ Federation. https://web.archive.org/web/20210625040555/https://www.bctf.ca/publications/BriefSection.aspx?id=46935
Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. (2020, December 10). Communications monitoring report. Government of Canada. https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/publications/reports/policyMonitoring/2020/cmr4.htm#a2
Dhanraj, T. (2019, December 1). Government consultation shows parents overwhelmingly reject class size increase: sources. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/6239822/parents-rejected-increased-class-sizes/
Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P-L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2014.916007
Freidhoff, J. R. (2019a, March 27). Michigan’s K-12 virtual learning effectiveness report, 2017-18. Michigan Virtual. https://mvlri.org/research/publications/michigans-k-12-virtual-learning-effectiveness-report-2017-18
Freidhoff, J. R. (2019b, May 28). Online learning graduation requirement: Lessons from Michigan. CANeLearn. https://canelearn.net/online-learning-graduation-requirement-lessons-from-michigan-guest-blogger/
Gallagher-Mackay, K., & Brown, R. S. (2021, July 14). The impact of school closures and emergency remote learning on grade 12 students in spring 2020: Preliminary findings from Toronto. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. https://heqco.ca/pub/the-impact-of-school-closures-and-emergency-remote-learning-on-grade-12-students-in-spring-2020-preliminary-findings-from-toronto/
Fowler, F. C. (2012). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (4th edition). Pearson.
Gorski, P. (2005). Education equity and the digital divide. AACE Review (formerly AACE Journal), 13(1), 3–45. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/6570/
Gale, T. (1999). Policy trajectories: Treading the discursive path of policy analysis. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20(3), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630990200304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630990200304
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kapoor, A. (2019). Connecting to success: Technology in Ontario schools. People for Education. https://peopleforeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/PFE_TechnologyReport_Apr2019-online-final.pdf
MacLeod, A., & Emes, J. (2019, April 24). Busting the myth of Ontario’s ‘massive education cuts.’ Fraser Institute. https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/busting-the-myth-of-ontarios-massive-education-cuts
Michigan Virtual University. (2018). School board guide to online learning (version 2). https://mvlri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/MV_Schoolboard_Guide_Web.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). Common core data: America’s public schools. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/tables/201314_Virtual_Schools_table_3.asp
Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. (2020, December). Value for money audit: Curriculum development, implementation and delivery. https://www.auditor.on.ca/en/content/annualreports/arreports/en20/20VFM_03curriculum.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (n.d.a). Class size consultation guide. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/parents/class-size-consultation.html
Ontario Ministry of Education. (n.d.b.). Elementary provincial report card. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/document/forms/report/card/0461E.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (n.d.c.). School board progress reports
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario curriculum grades 1 to 8: Science and technology. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/scientec18currb.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education (2013). Provincial e-learning strategy: Master user agreement.
Ontario Ministry of Education (2015). The Ontario curriculum grades 11 and 12: Canadian and world studies. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/2015cws11and12.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2019a, March 15). Education that works for you – modernizing classrooms. https://news.ontario.ca/en/backgrounder/51531/education-that-works-for-you-modernizing-classrooms
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2019b, November 21). Ontario brings learning into the digital age. https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/54695/ontario-brings-learning-into-the-digital-age
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2019c). The Ontario curriculum grades 9 to 12: First Nations, Metis and Inuit Studies (revised). http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/First-nations-metis-inuit-studies-grades-9-12.pdf
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2020). Policy/Program Memorandum 164: Requirements for remote learning. https://www.ontario.ca/document/education-ontario-policy-and-program-direction/policyprogram-memorandum-164
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2021a). Policy/Program Memorandum 151: Professional activity days devoted to provincial education priorities. https://www.ontario.ca/document/education-ontario-policy-and-program-direction/policyprogram-memorandum-151
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2021b). The Ontario curriculum grades 9 to 12: American Sign Language as a second language. https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/curriculum/american-sign-language-as-a-second-language
Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association. (2021, June 22). Ontario parents give Ford government failing grade on education. https://www.catholicteachers.ca/News-Events/News/Releases/Ontario-s-Parents-Give-Ford-Government-Failing-Gra
Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation. (2019, May 22). Impact of class size increases: Modelling the effects on school programs – full report. http://www.osstf.on.ca/en-CA/public-education/no-cuts-to-education/research-and-reports-on-education.aspx
Pal, L. A. (1992). Public policy analysis: An introduction. Nelson Canada.
People for Education. (2019, July 9). Ontario e-learning plan unique in North America. https://peopleforeducation.ca/our-work/ontario-e-learning-plan-unique-in-north-america/
PressProgress. (2021, May 14). Doug Ford’s government wants TVO to ‘commercialize’ online learning content designed for Ontario schools. https://pressprogress.ca/doug-fords-government-wants-tvo-to-commercialize-online-learning-content-designed-for-ontario-schools/
Robertson, L., Muirhead, B., & Corrigan, L. (2020). “Don’t answer that!” – Cell phone restrictions in Ontario Schools. Proceedings of The 11th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies (ICSIT 2020), 28–33. http://www.iiis.org/CDs2020/CD2020Spring/AuthorsH1.htm#
Robertson, L. & Muirhead, B. (2020). Coming soon to a device near you: A policy analysis of mandatory online learning. Proceedings of The 11th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies (ICSIT 2020), 19–24. https://www.iiis.org/CDs2020/CD2020Spring/papers/HB189IT.pdf
Statista. (2020). Enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools in Canada in 2018/19, by province. https://www.statista.com/statistics/449110/enrollment-in-public-elementary-and-secondary-schools-in-canada-by-province/
Statistics Canada. (2009, August 8). How connected are Canadian schools? http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/56f0004m/2004011/section4-eng.htm
Steer, R., Spours, K., Hodgson, A., Finlay, I., Coffield, F., Edward, S., & Gregson, M. (2007). ‘Modernisation’ and the role of policy levers in the learning and skills sector. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 59(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820701342574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820701342574
Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making. W. W. Norton & Company.
Stuart, L. (2019, Dec. 2). Statement from OECTA president Liz Stuart on the education consultation. Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association. https://www.catholicteachers.ca/News-Events/News/Releases/Statement-From-OECTA-President-Liz-Stuart-On-The-E
Vidovich, L. (2001, December). A conceptual framework for analysis of education policy and practices [Paper presentation]. AARE Annual Conference, Fremantle, Australia. https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2001/vid01267.pdf
Winton, S. (2020). Introduction. In S. Winton & G. Parekh (Eds.), Critical perspectives on education policy and schools, families, and communities (pp. vii–xvi). Information Age Publishing Inc.
Yanow, D. (2007). Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice. Critical Policy Studies, 1(1), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2007.9518511
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Lorayne Robertson, Bill Muirhead, Heather Leatham
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the OTESSA Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the OTESSA Journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the OTESSA Journal.