Surveillance in the System: Data as Critical Change in Higher Education




surveillance, data, datafication, higher education, datafied systems


Over recent decades, higher education infrastructures have become increasingly digitized and datafied. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of online learning platforms, trading the walls of the classroom for digital systems. Yet the surveillance, privacy, and discrimination issues that such systems raise are minimally understood by those who teach and learn within them. This paper overviews a 2020 pilot survey and 2021-2022 qualitative study of higher education instructors on a global scale. These projects explored the ways in which instructors from various locales and academic status positions understand data and classroom tools using proxy questions surrounding knowledge, practices, experiences, and perspectives. This paper draws on those studies to frame concerns about datafication amplifying issues in higher education. Its premises are twofold: first, if higher education instructors, as knowledge workers, are not knowledgeable about the contexts within which they teach and conduct scholarship, then the construct of shared governance within higher education is inevitably undermined. Secondly, if faculty and academic decision-makers are not intentional about equitable and ethical use of digital platforms within higher education, students’ privacy and data is at risk. In this conceptual paper, we outline findings that frame datafication as a critical change within higher education culture.


Andrejevic, M. (2012). Ubiquitous Surveillance. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Applin, S. A. (2019, April 21). What we sacrifice for automation. Fast Company.

Avella, J., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13-29. DOI:

Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2017). Rethinking Case Study Research. Routledge. DOI:

Beetham, H., Collier, A., Czerniewicz, L., Lamb, B., Lin, Y., Ross, J., Scott, A.-M., & Wilson, A. (2022). Surveillance Practices, Risks and Responses in the Post Pandemic University. Digital Culture & Education, 14(1).

Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Code. Polity. DOI:

Blackmore, P. & Kandiko, C. (2011). Motivation in academic life: A prestige economy. Research in post-compulsory education, 16(4), 399-411. DOI:

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., ... & Rodes, V. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in DOI:

Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI:

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. DOI:

Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. doi=10.1037%2Fqup0000196

Brinkman, B. (2013). An analysis of student privacy rights in the use of plagiarism detection systems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1255–1266. DOI:

Brooks, C. (2021, September 20). Privacy Opt-Out May Lead to Inequities. Inside Higher Ed.

Canadian Association of University Teachers. (2021). Shared governance. Quality education.,in%20their%20decision%2Dmaking%20process.

Cohney, S., Teixeira, R., Kohlbrenner, A., Narayanan, A., Kshirsagar, M., Shvartzshnaider, Y., & Sanfilippo, M. (2021). Virtual Classrooms and Real Harms: Remote Learning at U.S. Universities. ArXiv:2012.05867 [Cs].

Cukier, K., & Mayer-Schoenberger, V. (2013). The Rise of Big Data: How It’s Changing the Way We Think About the World. Foreign Affairs, 92(3), 28–40.

Currier, C. (2021). Unresolved Privacy and Ethics Issues Related to Learning Analytics in Higher Education and Academic Librarianship. Emerging Library & Information Perspectives, 4(1), 117–142. DOI:

Dijck, J. van. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. DOI:

do Amaral, M. P. (2022). Comparative Case Studies: Methodological Discussion. In S. Benasso, D. Bouillet, T. Neves, & M. Parreira do Amaral (Eds.), Landscapes of Lifelong Learning Policies across Europe: Comparative Case Studies (pp. 41–60). Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Erickson, K. (2018, July 17). The future of network effects: Tokenization and the end of extraction. Medium. Retrieved from

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.

Facer, K. (2021). Futures in education: towards an ethical practice. UNESCO Futures of Education Report.

Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5/6), 304–317. DOI:

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.

Gilliard, C., & Culik, H. (2016, May 24). Digital Redlining, Access, and Privacy [Article]. Common Sense Education.

Hillman, T., Rensfeldt, A. B., & Ivarsson, J. (2020). Brave new platforms: a possible platform future for highly decentralised schooling. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 7–16. DOI:

Jones, W. D. (2020, February 24). Racial Profiling Goes High Tech with Facial Recognition. IEEE Spectrum.

Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2022). Proctoring Software in Higher Ed. Light + Learning.

Land, R. & Bayne, S. (2013). Screen or monitor. In Bayne, S., & Land, R. (Eds.), Education in Cyberspace (pp. 165-179). London, UK: Routledge Falmer. DOI:

Lyon, D., Haggerty, K. D., & Bell, K. (2012). Introducing Surveillance Studies. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Abingdon, Oxon: R Jones outledge.

MacCarthy, M. (2014). Student Privacy: Harm and Context. International Review of Information Ethics, 21, 11–24. DOI:

Marx, G. T. (2012). Preface: “Your Papers Please”: Personal and Professional Encounters with Surveillance. In Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

McIlwain, C. (2020, June 3). Of course technology perpetuates racism. It was designed that way. | MIT Technology Review. MIT Technology Review.

Metcalf, J. (2022, March 17). Raising Algorithmic Impact Assessment. Medium.

Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: NYU Press. DOI:

O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. London, UK: Allen Lane Penguin Books.

Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450. DOI:

Pyöriä, P. (2005). The concept of knowledge work revisited. Journal of Knowledge DOI:

Management, 9(3), 116–127. DOI:

Raffaghelli, J. E., & Stewart, B. (2020). Centering complexity in ‘educators’ data literacy’ to support future practices in faculty development: a systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 435–455. DOI:

Sartre, J.-P. (1972). The Psychology of Imagination. Routledge.

Shilova, M. (2017, June 15). The concept of datafication: Definitions and examples. Apiumhub.

Siemens, G. (2013). Learning Analytics. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380-1400. DOI:

Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510-1529. DOI:

Southerton, C. (2020). Datafication. In L. A. Schintler & C. L. McNeely (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Big Data (pp. 1–4). Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stanley, J. (2022, February 8). A Scary Demonstration of What Unchecked Face Recognition Could Look Like. American Civil Liberties Union.

Stewart, B. E., & Lyons, E. (2021). When the Classroom Becomes Datafied: A Baseline for Building Data Ethics Policy and Data Literacies Across Higher Education. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 54–68.

Tsai, Y. & Gasevic, D. (2017). Learning analytics in higher education – challenges and policies: A review of eight learning analytics policies. In Proceedings of the 7th International Learning Analytics Knowledge Conference Mar. 2017, pp. 233–242. DOI:

Tufekci, Z. (2020). The Pandemic Is No Excuse to Surveil Students [Magazine]. The Atlantic.

Williamson, B. (2015). Governing software: Networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of public education.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (1): 83–105. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.924527 DOI:

Williamson, B. (2020). A review of datafication and automation in higher education. University and College Union.

Williamson, B., Bayne, S. & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in higher education: Critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351-365. DOI:

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. DOI:

Williamson, K., & Kizilcec, R. (2022). A Review of Learning Analytics Dashboard Research in Higher Education: Implications for Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion. LAK22: 12th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 260–270. DOI:

Youngstown State University. (2017, December 19). Principles and Practice of Shared

Governance. YSU.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.




How to Cite

Szcyrek, S., & Stewart, B. (2022). Surveillance in the System: Data as Critical Change in Higher Education . The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 2(2), 1–20.



Research Articles