Open Pedagogy and Transdisciplinary Thinking: Making Connections Through a Visual Artefact Self- Study




visual artefacts, self-study, open pedagogy, reflection-on-action, open educational resources, transdisciplinary, professional knowledge of practice, teacher education


The examination of teacher educators’ own practices through self-study research has been well established and self-study aligns with the growing interest in open educational resources (OER) and open pedagogy. This research used a self-study method of a Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Mathematics (STEAM) OER project, Form and Function(s): Sustainable Design meets Computational Thinking. Two research questions were pursued: How do open pedagogy attributes contribute to a transdisciplinary STEAM OER pedagogical stance? And how can one apply visual artifact self-study as intentional critical friends to examine professional value and to enhance pedagogical self-understanding? The researcher analyzed visual artifacts of created and documented images that supported the process of her interrogations of transdisciplinary curriculum development and open pedagogy. The sites and modalities of the artifacts were questioned and answers recorded using a critical visual methodology. Klein’s (2008, 2018) transdisciplinary thinking and the eight attributes of Hegarty’s (2015) open pedagogy frame the interrogation of the images and the connections made to curriculum theorizing. The self-study provides conclusions to the role of visual artifacts when conceptualizing the gestalt of complex ideas and relations. The self-study provides warranted assertions for open educators and researchers interested in the practices of transdisciplinary, open curricular and pedagogical processes alongside the eight attributes of open pedagogy, and the role of critical self-reflection.


Adams, C., & Thompson, T. L. (2016). Researching a post-human world: Interviews with digital objects. Palgrave MacMillan.

Biox-Mansilla, V. (2017). Learning to synthesize: A cognitive-epistemological foundation for interdisciplinary learning. In R. Pacheco (Ed.), The oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 1-15). Oxford University Press. DOI:

Blomgren, C. (2021, May 20). May 20, 2021 Update Form and Function(s). Blended and online learning and teaching multi-author blog.

Bozkurt, A. (2019). From distance education to open and distance learning: A holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories. In S. Sisman-Ugur, & G. Kurubacak (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning in the age of transhumanism (pp. 252–273). IGI Global. DOI:

Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2013). A topography of collaboration: Methodology, identity and community in self-study of practice research. Studying Teacher Education, 9(1), 74–89. DOI:

Hauge, K. (2021). Self-study research: Challenges and opportunities in teacher education. In M. J. DOI:

Hernández-Serrano (Ed.), Teacher education in the 21st century. IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.96252

Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13.

Hildebrand, D. (2018). John Dewey. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Kaushik, V., & Walsh, C. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences, 8(9), 1–17. DOI:

Klein, J. T. (2008). Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), S116–S123. DOI:

Klein, J. T. (2018). Learning in transdisciplinary collaborations: A conceptual vocabulary. In D. Fam, L. DOI:

Neuhauser, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Transdisciplinary theory, practice and education (pp. 11–23). Springer.

Loughran, J. J. (2004). A history and context of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. In J. J. DOI:

Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 7–39). DOI:

Loughran, J. J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20. DOI:

McLuhan, E., & McLuhan, M. (1992). Laws of Media: The New Science. University of Toronto Press.

McMurtry, A. (2013). Reframing interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration through the lens of collective and sociomaterial theories of learning. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 31, 75–98.

Meierdirk, C. (2016). Is reflective practice an essential component of becoming a professional teacher? Reflective Practice, 17(3), 369–378. DOI:

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. DOI:

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies (4th ed.). Sage.

Samaras, A. (2009). Explorations in using arts-based self-study methods. International Journal of Qualitative

Studies in Education, 23(6), 719–736. DOI:

Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith.

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday.

Vanassche, E., & Kelchtermans, G. (2015). The state of the art in self-study of teacher education practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(4), 508–528. DOI:

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Zwicky, J. (2019). The experience of meaning. McGill-Queen’s University Press. DOI:




How to Cite

Blomgren, C. (2021). Open Pedagogy and Transdisciplinary Thinking: Making Connections Through a Visual Artefact Self- Study. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 1(1), 1–18.



Research Articles