Connect to Learn: Assemblage of Pedagogies in Higher Education in a Community of Practice




community of practice, pedagogy, technology-facilitated community of practice, connectivism, technology, scholarship


In this paper, we report on the ways in which technology and scholarship of pedagogy emerge as interconnected within a technology-facilitated community of practice (CoP), for educators within various Faculties of Education in North American universities. The goal of the Community of Practice is to connect with and learn from one another, discussing, and reflecting on different types of pedagogical practices among members who teach in both graduate and teacher education programs in the onsite, blended, and online environments. We share analysis of interviews, and notes from CoP members’ feedback; how the CoP members made sense of their diverse teaching and social learning landscapes as well as emergent joint meanings. The results of the study suggest that the assemblage of new ideas and pedagogies can be enhanced by a relational trust. A highlighted role of technology in enabling communication and collaboration among CoP members is also discussed through the lens of connectivism.


Apple, M.W. (2006). Understanding and interrupting neoliberalism and neoconservatism in education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(1), 21-26. DOI:

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Bryk, A.S. & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40-43.

Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 113-124. DOI:

Goldie, J.G. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069. DOI:

Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for quantitative research. New York, NY: Aldine. ISBN: 9780202302607

Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-13. DOI:

Polkinghorne, D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 137-145. DOI:

McDonald J., & Cater-Steel, A. (Eds), (2017), Implementing communities of practice in higher education: Dreamers and schemers. Springer, Singapore. DOI:

Rigas, B., & Kuchapski, R. (2016). “Strengthening” Ontario universities: A neoliberal reconstruction of higher education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (180), 47-70.

Schultz, M. & O’Brien, G. (2017), The Australian Chemistry Discipline Network: A supportive community of practice in a hard science. In J McDonald J & A Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 501-530). Springer, Singapore. DOI:

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).

Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning and knowledge today. Global Summit 2006: Technology Connected Futures.

Soto, M., Gupta, D., Dick, L., & Appelgate, M. (2019). Bridging distances: Professional development for higher education faculty through technology-facilitated lesson study. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 16(3), 1-19. DOI:

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Thorsen, D.E. (2010). The neoliberal challenge: What is neoliberalism? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 188-214.

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction.

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice. Learning in landscapes of practice. Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning, 13-30. DOI:

Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. (2010). Learning in communities. In U.D. Ehlers & D. Schneckenberg (Eds.), Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 257-283). Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin. DOI:

Williams, J., Ritter, J., & Bullock, S. (2012). Understanding the complexity of becoming a teacher educator: Experience, belonging, and practice within a professional learning community. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 245-260. DOI:




How to Cite

Fournier, E., Sedaghatjou, M., & Namukasa, I. (2021). Connect to Learn: Assemblage of Pedagogies in Higher Education in a Community of Practice . The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 1(2), 1–19.



Research Articles