Connecter Pour Apprendre: Assemblage de Pédagogies dans l'Enseignement Supérieur dans une Communauté de Pratique
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2021.1.2.10Mots-clés :
communauté de pratique, la pédagogie, communauté de pratique facilitée par la technologie, le connectivisme, la technologieRésumé
Dans cet article, nous rapportons les façons dont les technologies et le développement des savoirs pédagogiques émergent comme interconnectés au sein d'une communauté de pratique facilitée par le numérique (CoP), pour les formateurs dans diverses facultés d'éducation d’universités nord-américaines. L'objectif de la communauté de pratique est de réseauter et d'apprendre les uns des autres, de discuter et de réfléchir à différents types de pratiques pédagogiques parmi les personnes qui enseignent dans les programmes de formation à l’enseignement, au premier cycle et aux cycles supérieurs, dans des modalités de cours en présentiel, hybride et en ligne. Nous partageons l'analyse des entretiens et les rétroactions des des membres de la CoP, la façon dont les membres de la CoP ont donné un sens à leurs divers environnements d'enseignement et d'apprentissage social ainsi que les thèmes émergents communs. Les résultats de l'étude suggèrent que l'assemblage de nouvelles idées et pédagogies peut être amélioré par la confiance relationnelle entre les membres. Le rôle accru des technologies dans la communication et la collaboration entre les membres de la CoP est également discuté à travers le prisme du connectivisme.
Références
Apple, M.W. (2006). Understanding and interrupting neoliberalism and neoconservatism in education. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_4
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/12080269
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/36074515
Bryk, A.S. & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40-43. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/trust-in-schools-a-core-resource-for-school-reform
Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? Research in Learning Technology, 12(2), 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968776042000216183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v12i2.11246
Goldie, J.G. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for quantitative research. New York, NY: Aldine. ISBN: 9780202302607
Kop, R. & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523
Polkinghorne, D.E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
McDonald J., & Cater-Steel, A. (Eds), (2017), Implementing communities of practice in higher education: Dreamers and schemers. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3
Rigas, B., & Kuchapski, R. (2016). “Strengthening” Ontario universities: A neoliberal reconstruction of higher education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (180), 47-70. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1121387.pdf
Schultz, M. & O’Brien, G. (2017), The Australian Chemistry Discipline Network: A supportive community of practice in a hard science. In J McDonald J & A Cater-Steel (Eds.), Implementing communities of practice in higher education (pp. 501-530). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2866-3_22
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1083.5064&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning and knowledge today. Global Summit 2006: Technology Connected Futures. https://cupdf.com/document/george-siemens-global-summit-2006-connectivism-learning-and-knowledge-today.html
Soto, M., Gupta, D., Dick, L., & Appelgate, M. (2019). Bridging distances: Professional development for higher education faculty through technology-facilitated lesson study. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 16(3), 1-19. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1224005.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.16.3.7
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/39257153
Thorsen, D.E. (2010). The neoliberal challenge: What is neoliberalism? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 188-214. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=156221
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. http://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice. Learning in landscapes of practice. Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning, 13-30. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777122-3
Wenger, E., White, N., & Smith, J. (2010). Learning in communities. In U.D. Ehlers & D. Schneckenberg (Eds.), Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 257-283). Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783642035814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_20
Williams, J., Ritter, J., & Bullock, S. (2012). Understanding the complexity of becoming a teacher educator: Experience, belonging, and practice within a professional learning community. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2012.719130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2012.719130
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Elaine Fournier, Mina Sedaghatjou, Immaculate Namukasa 2021
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors contributing to the OTESSA Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the OTESSA Journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the OTESSA Journal.
