Participation in OER Creation: A Trajectory of Values




open pedagogy, open educational practice, open educational resources, open education


This paper provides an analysis of interviews with seven faculty members who engaged in creating Open textbooks funded by government grants at a university in Canada in 2018. Using four values—access and equity, community and connection, agency and ownership, and risk and responsibility—identified by Sinkinson (2018), McAndrew (2018), and Keyek-Fransen (2018), we traced the ways in which university faculty members’ understanding of Open changed through the process of Open Educational Resource creation. As a teaching support-focused unit, we explore ways to provide our faculty and instructors with meaningful opportunities to develop their Open pedagogy. These findings reconceive the way that Open Educational Practice can be promoted at our University and others. Instead of focusing solely on OER creation, our faculty started engaging in thinking through the different conceptions of Open educational practice and identifying which concepts resonated with them. By reframing the ways in which faculty thought about Open Educational Practices, we have been better able to address the ways in which we support them.


Bali, M. (2017). April open perspective: What is open pedagogy? Year of Open.

Beetham, H., Falconer, I., McGill, L. & Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open practices: briefing paper.


Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of Open Educational Practices in

higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). DOI:

Cronin, C. (2017, April 24). Opening up Open pedagogy. Catherine Cronin.

Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Glover, M., & Walji, S. (2017). MOOC—Making and open

educational practices. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 81-97.

DeRosa, R., & Jhangiani, R. (n.d.). Open Pedagogy. In Open pedagogy notebook.

DeRosa, R., & Jhangiani, R. (2016, November 3). Free + freedom: The role of Open pedagogy

in the Open Education Movement [Paper presentation]. 2016 Open Education Conference. Richmond, VA.

Hegarty, B. (2015, July-August). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open

educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13.

Hendricks, C. (2017). Navigating open pedagogy, Part 2 – You’re the teacher. You’re The


Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Gray, E. (2009). Degrees of Openness: The Emergence of Open

Educational Resources at the University of Cape Town. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 5(5), 101–116.

Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2010). Benefits and challenges of OER for higher education

institutions. Commonwealth of Learning.

Jhangiani, R. (2018, October 5). Open Educational Practices in service of the sustainable

development goals. That Psych Prof.

Keyek-Franssen, D. (2018, November 14). 5 tips for supporting inclusive and Open pedagogies.

Educause Review.

Lambert, S., & Czerniewicz, L. (2020). Approaches to Open Education and social justice

research. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1). DOI:

McAndrew, A. (2018, November 8). Inclusive and Open pedagogies. Educause Review.

Meger, E., Freeman, W., Schwartz, M., Ludbrook, A., & Glynn, M. (2020). Ryerson Open

Moments. Ryerson University Press.

Rosen, J. R. & Smale, M. A. (2015, January 6). Open digital pedagogy. Hybrid Pedagogy.

Sinkinson, C. (2018, November 18). The values of Open pedagogy. Educause Review.

Stommel, J. (2015, May 28). Open door classroom.

Schwartz, M. (n.d.). Open pedagogy. Ryerson University Press.

Watters, A. (2014, November 15). From open to justice.




How to Cite

Meger, E., Schwartz, M., & Freeman, W. (2021). Participation in OER Creation: A Trajectory of Values. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 1(2), 1–10.



Research Articles