Co-création pendant un cours : Une réflexion critique sur les opportunités de co-apprentissage
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2023.3.1.43Mots-clés :
co-création, co-conception, co-apprentissage, pédagogie ouverteRésumé
La co-création est une pratique ouverte dans laquelle les apprenants participent à la prise de décision concernant certains aspects de la conception des cours, ce qui, dans notre contexte, comprend diverses activités allant de la conception des cours aux décisions d'évaluation. Après la conférence OTESSA22, ce groupe de participants à la conférence a réfléchi aux pratiques et expériences de co-création dans leurs contextes postsecondaires respectifs. Dans cet article, nous partageons des réflexions et des défis liés à la co-création ainsi que des idées pour potentiellement surmonter ces défis. Cet article, avec des exemples tirés de la pratique, sert de point de départ à un dialogue continu sur les approches inclusives de co-création.
Références
Barnacle, R. & Dall’Alba, G. (2017). Committed to learn: student engagement and care in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(7), 1326-1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1326879
Blau, I., & Shamir-Inbal, T. (2017). Re-designed flipped learning model in an academic course: The role of co-creation and co-regulation. Computers and Education, 115, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.014
Bovill, C. & Woolmer, C. (2019). How conceptualisations of curriculum in higher education influence student-staff co-creation in and of the curriculum. Higher Education 78(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0349-8
Bovill, C. (2020a). Co-creating learning and teaching: Towards relational pedagogy in higher education. Critical Publishing. https://www.criticalpublishing.com/co-creating-learning-and-teaching
Bovill, C. (2020b). Co-creation in learning and teaching: The case for a whole-class approach in higher education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w
CAST (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Chen, W., Sanderson, N.C., & Kessel, S. (2018). Making learning materials accessible in higher education - attitudes among technology faculty members. In Craddock, G., Doran, C. & McNutt, L. (Eds.), Transforming our world through design, diversity and education (pp. 87-97). ISO Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-923-2-87
Cook, D. A., & Artino, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
Doyle, E., Buckley P. & McCarthy, B. (2021). The impact of content co-creation on academic achievement, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(3), 494-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1782832
Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engagement? New Directions for Teaching & Learning, 2018(154), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20287
Killam, L. A., Camargo-Plazas, P., & Luctkar-Flude, M. (2023, in press). Learner-educator co-creation: A case for enhancing authentic assessment in nursing education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
Killam, L. A., Lock, M., & Luctkar-Flude, M. (2023, in press). Principles for equity-centered learner-educator co-creation: A reflection on practice and pedagogy. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership, and Change.
Lerdpornkulrat, T., Koul, R., & Poondej, C. (2018). Relationship between perceptions of classroom climate and institutional goal structures and student motivation, engagement and intention to persist in college. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2016.1206855
Locatis, C. & Al-Nuaim, H. (1999). Interactive technology and authoring tools: A historical review and analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299634
MacKnight, C., & Balagopalan, S. (1989). An evaluation tool for measuring authoring system performance. Communications of the ACM, 32, 1231-1236. https://doi.org/10.1145/67933.67940
Marquart, M., & Verdooner, E. (2020). Strategy: Co-creating Classroom Community Agreements. The Journal of Faculty Development, 34(3), 87-88. http://proxy.lib.trentu.ca/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/strategy-co-creating-classroom-community/docview/2478112833/se-2
Novak, E., McDaniel, K., Daday, J., & Soyturk, I. (2022). Frustration in technology‐rich learning environments: A scale for assessing student frustration with e‐textbooks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 408–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13172
Ritter, S., & Blessing, S. B. (1998). Authoring tools for component-based learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0701_4
Valcarlos, M. M., Wolgemuth, J. R., Haraf, S., & Fisk, N. (2020). Anti-oppressive pedagogies in online learning: a critical review, Distance Education, 41(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1763783
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Laura Killam, Lillian Chumbley, Susanna Kohonen, Jim Stauffer, Jess Mitchell 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Authors contributing to the OTESSA Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the OTESSA Journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the OTESSA Journal.
