Technology-Integrated Assessment: A Literature Review




assessment, technology, technology-integrated assessment, digital learning, higher education, technology-integrated learning, educational technology


The purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of the scholarly literature between 2016 and 2023 on the impact of classroom technology on higher education instructors’ assessment practices through the lens of the assessment design in a digital world framework (Bearman et al., 2022). Specifically, the paper focuses on (a) describing the assessment design in a digital world framework, (b) identifying the scope and breadth of the literature relating to technology-integrated assessment, and (c) highlighting any gaps between the Bearman et al. model and the literature. This paper marks an important step in extending our understanding of the factors influencing instructors who integrate technology into their assessment practice and promoting ethical and equitable approaches to technology-integrated assessment in higher education.


Adama, E. A., Graf, A., Adusei-Asante, K., & Afrifa-Yamoah, E. (2023). COVID-19 and alternative assessments in higher education: Implications for academic integrity among nursing and social science students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1–19. DOI:

Adanir, G. A., Ismailova, R., Omuraliev, A., & Muhametjanova, G. (2020). Learners’ Perceptions of Online Exams: A Comparative Study in Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 1–17. DOI:

Adiguzel, T., Varank, I., Erkoc, M., & Buyukimdat, M. (2017). Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics Science And Technology Education, 13(1), 237–251. DOI:

Aini, Q. (2020). Digitalization of Smart Student Assessment Quality in Era 4.0. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(1.2), 257–265. DOI:

Aji, A. A., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). Assessing Students During Online Learning: A Case Study on a Linguistic Subject Teacher’s Experience. Language Circle (Semarang ), 16(2), 264–273. DOI:

Almossa, S. Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163–7181. DOI:

Almossa, S. Y., & Alzahrani, S. M. (2022). Lessons on maintaining assessment integrity during COVID-19. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 1–17. DOI:

Alsabhan, W. (2023). Student Cheating Detection in Higher Education by Implementing Machine Learning and LSTM Techniques. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 23(8), 4149. DOI:

Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students’ Perceptions of E-Assessment at Saudi Electronic University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 16(1), 147–153.

Alshamsi, A., Zahavich, A., & El-Farra, S. (2021). Why Graded Assessment for Undergraduates during the COVID-19 Lockdown? An Experience Introspection. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 55–75. DOI:

Altowairiki, N. (2021). Online Collaborative Learning: Analyzing the Process through Living the Experience. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 413–427. DOI:

Aluko, F. R., & Omidire, M. F. (2020). A Critical Review of Student Assessment Practices in Distance Education in an Emerging Economy: Benchmarking Practices against Policy. Africa Education Review, 17(5), 76–94. DOI:

Alvi, A. H., Bilal, S. M., & Alvi, A. A. R. (2021). Technology, Pedagogy & Assessment: Challenges of COVID-19-Imposed E-Teaching of ESP to Saudi Female PY Students. Arab World English Journal, 334–353. DOI:

Arsenis, P., Flores, M., & Petropoulou, D. (2022). Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 47(2), 245–258. DOI:

Azizi, Z. (2022). Fairness in assessment practices in online education: Iranian University English teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–17. DOI:

Babo, R., V. Babo, L., T Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2020). E- Assessment with Multiple-Choice Questions: A 5 Year Study of Students’ Opinions and Experience. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 19, 001–029. DOI:

Baboolal-Frank, R. (2021). Emergency Remote Learning during the Pandemic from a South African Perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. DOI:

Bader, M., Iversen, S., & Burner, T. (2021). Students’ perceptions and use of a new digital tool in teacher education. Nordic Journal Of Digital Literacy, 16(1), 21–33. DOI:

Badke, W. (2023). AI challenges to information literacy. Computers in Libraries, 43(3), 41–42.

Balasubramanian, B., DeSantis, C., & Gulotta, M. (2020). Assessment à la Mode: Implementing an Adaptable Large-Scale Multivariant Online Deferred-Grade Exam for Virtual Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(12), 4297–4302. DOI:

Baso, Y. S., Murtadho, N., -, S., Maulani, H., Agussalim, A., -, H., Fadlan, A., & Ramadhan, I. (2023). Reducing Cheating in Online Exams Through the Proctor Test Model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 14(1). DOI:

BC Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Training. (2022). Digital Learning Advisory Committee Draft Recommendations.

Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Bennett, S., Hall, M., Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Joughin, G. (2017). How university teachers design assessments: A cross-disciplinary study. Higher Education, 74(1), 49–64. DOI:

Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556. DOI:

Bearman, M., Nieminen, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Designing assessment in a digital world: An organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3). DOI:

Belt, E. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2021). Video Use in Online and Blended Courses: A Qualitative Synthesis. Distance Education, 42(3), 410–440. DOI:

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. DOI:

Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682. DOI:

Bhute, V. J., Campbell, J., Kogelbauer, A., Shah, U. V., & Brechtelsbauer, C. (2020). Moving to Timed Remote Assessments: The Impact of COVID-19 on Year End Exams in Chemical Engineering at Imperial College London. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2760–2767. DOI:

Biasutti, M. (2017). A coding scheme to analyse the online asynchronous discussion forums of university students. Technology Pedagogy And Education, 26(5), 601–615. DOI:

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. DOI:

Bommineni, V. L., Bhagwagar, S., Balcarcel, D., Davatzikos, C., & Boyer, D. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on the MCAT: The Road to Personalized and Equitable Premedical Learning [Preprint]. Medical Education. DOI:

Bopegedera, A. M. R. P. (2020). Using Familiar and New Assessment Tools in Physical Chemistry Courses During COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3260–3264. DOI:

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. DOI:

Brady, M., Devitt, A., & Kiersey, R. A. (2019). Academic Staff Perspectives on Technology for Assessment (TFA) in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3080–3098. DOI:

Broadfoot, P. (2016). Assessment for Twenty-First-Century Learning: The Challenges Ahead. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Buczek-Zawila, A. (2021). Catering to Assessment Needs of Students of English – CALL to the Rescue? Teaching English with Technology, 21(2), 38–65.

Bullock, A., Colvin, A. D., & Jackson, M. S. (2022). Zoom Fatigue in the Age of COVID-19. Journal of Social Work in the Global Community, 6(1). DOI:

Campbell, C., & Tran, T. (2021). Using an Implementation Trial of an ePortfolio System to Promote Student Learning through Self-Reflection: Leveraging the Success. Education Sciences, 11(6). DOI:

Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021). Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback. Research And Practice In Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). DOI:

Celik, I., Gedrimiene, E., Silvola, A., & Muukkonen, H. (2022). Response of learning analytics to the online education challenges during pandemic: Opportunities and key examples in higher education. Policy Futures In Education. DOI:

Chadha, D., Maraj, M., & Kogelbauer, A. (2020). Opening up Assessment in the Age of COVID-19: Exploring the Utility of Online Open-Book Exams. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(4).

Chanpet, P., Chomsuwan, K., & Murphy, E. (2020). Online Project-Based Learning and Formative Assessment. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 685–705. DOI:

Clarke, J., & Boud, D. (2018). Refocusing portfolio assessment: Curating for feedback and portrayal. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 479–486. DOI:

Cleveland, R. (2018). Using Digital Portfolios: Reflection, Assessment & Employment. TechTrends, 62(3), 276–285. DOI:

Combrinck, M., & van Vollenhoven, W. (2020). Computer-assisted assessment: An old remedy for challenges in open distance learning. Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 22–34.

Cook, B. R., & Babon, A. (2017). Active Learning through Online Quizzes: Better Learning and Less (Busy) Work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 24–38. DOI:

Corral, D., Carpenter, S. K., Perkins, K., & Gentile, D. A. (2020). Assessing students’ use of optional online lecture reviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 318–329. DOI:

Cosi, S., Voltas, N., Lazaro-Cantabrana, J., Morales, P., Calvo, M., Molina, S., & Quiroga, M. (2020). Formative assessment at university using digital technology tools. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación Del Profesorado, 24(1), 164–183. DOI:

Dallas, B. K., McCarthy, A. K., & Long, G. (2016). Examining the Educational Benefits of and Attitudes toward Closed Captioning among Undergraduate Students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 50–65. DOI:

Dawson, P., & Henderson, M. (2017). How Does Technology Enable Scaling Up Assessment for Learning? In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (Vol. 5, pp. 209–222). Springer Singapore. DOI:

De Brún, A., Rogers, L., Drury, A., & Gilmore, B. (2022). Evaluation of a formative peer assessment in research methods teaching using an online platform: A mixed methods pre-post study. Nurse Education Today, 108, 105166–105166. DOI:

de Lange, T., Møystad, A., & Torgersen, G. (2020). How Can Video-Based Assignments Integrate Practical and Conceptual Knowledge in Summative Assessment? Student Experiences from a Longitudinal Experiment. British Educational Research Journal, 46(6), 1279–1299. DOI:

Debuse, J. C. W., & Lawley, M. (2016). Benefits and Drawbacks of Computer-Based Assessment and Feedback Systems: Student and Educator Perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 294–301. DOI:

del Gobbo, E., Guarino, A., Cafarelli, B., Grilli, L., & Limone, P. (2023). Automatic evaluation of open-ended questions for online learning. A systematic mapping. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 77, 101258. DOI:

DeMara, R., Tian, T., & Howard, W. (2019). Engineering assessment strata: A layered approach to evaluation spanning Bloom’s taxonomy of learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1147–1171. DOI:

Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., & Carless, D. (2018). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 487–496. DOI:

Dery, L. (2023). Forming a ranking from tied evaluations: A case of an online, interactive student peer assessment system.

DeWaard, H., & Roberts, V. (2021). Revisioning the potential of Freire’s principles of assessment: Influences on the art of assessment in open and online learning through blogging. Distance Education, 1–17.

Di Lauro, F. (2020). ’If It Is Not in Wikipedia, Blame Yourself:’ Edit-a-thons as Vehicles for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(5), 1003–1014. DOI:

Dicks, A. P., Morra, B., & Quinlan, K. B. (2020). Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Crisis: Adjusting Assessment Approaches within Introductory Organic Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3406–3412. DOI:

Dron, J. (2022). Educational technology: What it is and how it works. AI & Society, 37(1), 155–166. DOI:

Duncan, A., & Joyner, D. (2022). On the necessity (or lack thereof) of digital proctoring: Drawbacks, perceptions, and alternatives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1482–1496. DOI:

Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (Second edition). Corwin Press.

Ebert, J. G., Anderson, J. R., & Taylor, L. F. (2020). Enhancing Reflective Practice of Student Physical Therapists through Video-Assisted Self and Peer-Assessment: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 31–38.

Egarter, S., Mutschler, A., & Brass, K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on digital medical education: Compatibility of digital teaching and examinations with integrity and ethical principles. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–19. DOI:

Elkhatat, A. M. (2023). Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: A study on text-matching capabilities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 15. DOI:

Ellis, R., Bliuc, A.-M., & Han, F. (2021). Challenges in assessing the nature of effective collaboration in blended university courses. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 37(1), 1–14. DOI:

Ellis, S., & Barber, J. (2016). Expanding and Personalising Feedback in Online Assessment: A Case Study in a School of Pharmacy. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 121–129.

Farrell, O. (2020). From Portafoglio to Eportfolio: The Evolution of Portfolio in Higher Education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 19. DOI:

Fernandez-Ferrer, M., & Cano, E. (2016). The influence of the internet for pedagogical innovation: Using twitter to promote online collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13. DOI:

Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing (Leeds), 24(4), 230–235. DOI:

Forkan, A. R. M., Kang, Y.-B., Jayaraman, P. P., Du, H., Thomson, S., Kollias, E., & Wieland, N. (2023). VideoDL: Video-Based Digital Learning Framework Using AI Question Generation and Answer Assessment. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 16(1), 19–27. DOI:

Forkosh-Baruch, A., Phillips, M., & Smits, A. (2021). Reconsidering Teachers’ Pedagogical Reasoning and Decision Making for Technology Integration as an Agenda for Policy, Practice and Research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2209–2224. DOI:

Fuller, R., Goddard, V., Nadarajah, V., Treasure-Jones, T., Yeates, P., Scott, K., Webb, A., Valter, K., & Pyorala, E. (2022). Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations. Medical Teacher, 44(8), 836–850. DOI:

Gallavan, N., Huffman, S., & Shaw, E. (2017). Ensuring Ethics and Equity With Classroom Assessments and Mobile Technology: Advancing Online Education. In M. Mills & D. Wake (Eds.), Empowering Learners With Mobile Open-Access Learning Initiatives (pp. 220–241). DOI:

Gamage, K. A. A., Pradeep, R. G. G. R., & de Silva, E. K. (2022). Rethinking Assessment: The Future of Examinations in Higher Education. Sustainability, 14(6), 3552. DOI:

Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. de, & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online Delivery and Assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding Academic Integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. DOI:

García López, A., & García Mazarío, F. (2016). The Use of Technology in a Model of Formative Assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(2), 91–103. DOI:

Garcia-Alberti, M., Suarez, F., Chiyon, I., & Mosquera Feijoo, J. C. (2021). Challenges and Experiences of Online Evaluation in Courses of Civil Engineering during the Lockdown Learning Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(2), 59. DOI:

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. DOI:

Gikandi, J. (2021). Enhancing E-Learning Through Integration of Online Formative Assessment and Teaching Presence. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 11(2), 48–61. DOI:

Gil-Jaurena, I., Domínguez-Figaredo, D., & Ballesteros-Velázquez, B. (2022). Learning outcomes based assessment in distance higher education. A case study. Open Learning, 37(2), 193–208. DOI:

Goertler, S., & Gacs, A. (2018). Assessment in Online German: Assessment Methods and Results. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 51(2), 156–174. DOI:

González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2020). Examining the Effect of an Online Formative Assessment Tool (OFAT) of Students’ Motivation and Achievement for a University Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 401–414. DOI:

Gradisek, P., & Polak, A. (2021). Insights into learning and examination experience of higher education students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sodobna Pedagogika-Journal Of Contemporary Educational Studies, 72, 286–307.

Grier, D., Lindt, S. F., & Miller, S. C. (2021). Formative Assessment with Game-Based Technology. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(2), 193–202. DOI:

Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: A case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(4), 519–535. DOI:

Gudiño Paredes, S., Jasso Peña, F. de J., & de La Fuente Alcazar, J. M. (2021). Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education? Distance Education, 42(2), 200–218. DOI:

Gunning, T. K., Conlan, X. A., Collins, P. K., Bellgrove, A., Antlej, K., Cardilini, A. P. A., & Fraser, C. L. (2022). Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–22. DOI:

Gupta, M. M., Jankie, S., Pancholi, S. S., Talukdar, D., Sahu, P. K., & Sa, B. (2020). Asynchronous Environment Assessment: A Pertinent Option for Medical and Allied Health Profession Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(12), 352. DOI:

Gupta, T., Shree, A., Chanda, P., & Banerjee, A. (2023). Online assessment techniques adopted by the university teachers amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100579–100579. DOI:

Gusev, M., Ristov, S., & Armenski, G. (2016). Technologies for interactive learning and assessment content development. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 14(1), 22–43. DOI:

Haber, N., & Mitchell, T. N. (2017). Using Formative & Summative Assessment to Evaluate Library Instruction in an Online First Year Writing Course. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 11(3-4), 300–313. DOI:

Haider, A. S., Hussein, R. F., & Saed, H. A. (2022). Jordanian University Instructors’ Practices and Perceptions of Online Testing in the COVID-19 Era. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 7. DOI:

Haj-Yahya, A., & Olsher, S. (2022). Preservice teachers’ experiences with digital formative assessment in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1751–1769. DOI:

Halaweh, M. (2021). Are Universities Using the Right Assessment Tools during the Pandemic and Crisis Times? Higher Learning Research Communications, 11, 1–9. DOI:

Hartmann, J., Schwenzow, J., & Witte, M. (2023). The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI:

Hébert, C. (2021). Online Remote Proctoring Software in the Neoliberal Institution: Measurement, Accountability, and Testing Culture. In Education, 27(1), 23–40. DOI:

Hedtrich, S., & Graulich, N. (2018). Using Software Tools To Provide Students in Large Classes with Individualized Formative Feedback. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(12), 2263–2267. DOI:

Herbert, K., Demskoi, D., & Cullis, K. (2019). Creating mathematics formative assessments using LaTeX, PDF forms and computer algebra. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 153–167. DOI:

Hilliger, I., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Alexandron, G., & Gašević, D. (2022). Trustworthy remote assessments: A typology of pedagogical and technological strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. DOI:

hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. DOI:

Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change (B. Bell, J. Gaventa, & J. Peters, Eds.). Temple University Press.

Hussein, M. J., Yusuf, J., Deb, A. S., Fong, L., & Naidu, S. (2020). An Evaluation of Online Proctoring Tools. Open Praxis, 12(4), 509–525. DOI:

Ibarra-Saiz, M. S., Rodriguez-Gomez, G., Lukas-Mujika, J. F., & Santos-Berrondo, A. (2023). Methods and instruments to assess learning outcomes in master’s degrees. Analysis of teachers’ perception of their evaluative practice. Educación XX1, 26(1), 21–45. DOI:

Jaam, M., Nazar, Z., Rainkie, D. C., Hassan, D. A., Hussain, F. N., Kassab, S. E., & Agouni, A. (2021). Using Assessment Design Decision Framework in understanding the impact of rapid transition to remote education on student assessment in health-related colleges: A qualitative study. PloS One, 16(7). DOI:

Janse van Rensburg, C., Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2022). Developing digital creativity through authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 857–877. DOI:

Jiao, H., & Lissitz, R. W. (2020). What Hath the Coronavirus Brought to Assessment? Unprecedented Challenges in Educational Assessment in 2020 and Years to Come. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 39(3), 45–48. DOI:

Jopp, R. (2020). A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 942–958. DOI:

Jorm, C., Roberts, C., Gordon, C., Nisbet, G., & Roper, L. (2019). Time for University Educators to Embrace Student Videography. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(6), 673–693. DOI:

Karim, M. A. (2021). Hybrid and Online Synchronous Delivery of Environmental Engineering during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study on Perception, Attitude, and Assessment. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). DOI:

Kerrigan, J., Cochran, G., Tabanli, S., Charnley, M., & Mulvey, S. (2022). Post-COVID Changes to Assessment Practices: A Case Study of Undergraduate STEM Recitations. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(2), 192–201. DOI:

Ketchum, C., Phompheng, E., Yeats, C., LaFave, D., & Hardy, J. (2022). The Impact of Video Feedback on Student Assessments and Performance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 36(4), 288–301. DOI:

Ketonen, L., Lehtinen, A., & Koskinen, P. (2023). Assessment designs of instructional labs: A literature review and a design model. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020601. DOI:

Khajeloo, M., Birt, J. A., Kenderes, E. M., Siegel, M. A., Nguyen, H., Ngo, L. T., Mordhorst, B. R., & Cummings, K. (2022). Challenges and Accomplishments of Practicing Formative Assessment: A Case Study of College Biology Instructors’ Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 237–254. DOI:

Khalaf, K., El-Kishawi, M., Moufti, M., & Al Kawas, S. (2020). Introducing a comprehensive high-stake online exam to final-year dental students during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of its effectiveness. Medical Education Online, 25(1). DOI:

Khokhar, A. (2022). Teaching during COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Experiences, Perceptions and Lessons for Higher Education Institutes. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 38(1-3), 24–33. DOI:

Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100074. DOI:

Kim, V. (2018). Technology-Enhanced Feedback on Student Writing in the English-Medium Instruction Classroom. English Teaching, 73(4), 29–53. DOI:

Kloppers, M., & Potgieter, E. (2023). Your feedback procedure, my inspiration: Enhancing student achievement through assessment. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), 1–11. DOI:

Knight, G. L., & Drysdale, T. D. (2020). The future of higher education (HE) hangs on innovating our assessment - but are we ready, willing and able? Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 57–60. DOI:

Koneru, I. (2017). Exploring Moodle Functionality For Managing Open Distance Learning E-Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 129–141. DOI:

Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2019). Students’ Beliefs Regarding the Use of E-portfolio to Enhance Cognitive Skills in a Blended Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies In Learning, 14(2), 85–104. DOI:

Korhonen, A.-M., Ruhalahti, S., Lakkala, M., & Veermans, M. (2020). Vocational Student Teachers’ Self-Reported Experiences in Creating ePortfolios. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(3), 278–301. DOI:

Köroglu, Z. Çetin. (2021). Using Digital Formative Assessment to Evaluate EFL Learners’ English Speaking Skills. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 22, 103–123. DOI:

Kumar, R. (2020). Assessing Higher Education in the COVID-19 Era. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 29(2), 37–41. DOI:

Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 5(3). DOI:

Landi, A. K., & Minden, K. (2022). Metacognitive assessments for undergraduate mathematics courses in the time of covid-19. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. DOI:

Lapena-Manero, P., Garcia-Casuso, C., Miguel Montenegro-Cooper, J., King, R. W., & Behrens, E. M. (2022). An Open-Source System for Generating and Computer Grading Traditional Non-Coding Assignments. Electronics (Basel), 11(6), 917. DOI:

Law, Y. K., Tobin, R. W., Wilson, N. R., & Brandon, L. A. (2020). Improving Student Success by Incorporating Instant-Feedback Questions and Increased Proctoring in Online Science and Mathematics Courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 9, 64–78. DOI:

Lee, A. V. Y., Luco, A. C., & Tan, S. C. (2023). A Human-Centric Automated Essay Scoring and Feedback System for the Development of Ethical Reasoning. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 147–159.

Lee, V., Lam, P., Lo, J., Lee, J., & Li, J. (2022). Rethinking online assessment from university students’ perspective in COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, 9(1). DOI:

Lei, C., & Chan, C. (2018). Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments. Computers & Education, 126, 153–169. DOI:

Lilley, M., Meere, J., & Barker, T. (2016). Remote Live Invigilation: A Pilot Study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1). DOI:

Lipnevich, A. A., Guskey, T. R., Murano, D. M., & Smith, J. K. (2020). What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 480–500. DOI:

Lucas, K. L. (2021). The Use of 3-D Modeling and Printing to Teach the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology. Science Activities: Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms, 58(2), 70–76. DOI:

Luckin, R., Clark, W., Avramides, K., Hunter, J., & Oliver, M. (2017). Using teacher inquiry to support technology-enhanced formative assessment: A review of the literature to inform a new method. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(1), 85–97. DOI:

Maboe, K. A., & Tomas, N. (2023). Online assessments and COVID-19: A qualitative study of undergraduate nursing students in Southern Africa. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 19, 100590. DOI:

Madland, C., Ofosuhene, M., & Adkins, J. (2022). Digital Platforms and Algorithmic Erasure: What are the Implications? OTESSA Conference 2022. DOI:

Mahabeer, P., & Akoo, F. (2021). Connecting assessment and feedback: A customised and personalised experience for knowledge-building. Journal of Education, 83, 87–110. DOI:

Mankute, A., Juozapaviciene, L., Stucinskas, J., Dambrauskas, Z., Dobozinskas, P., Sinz, E., Rodgers, D. L., Pukenyte, E., Kumpaitiene, B., & Vaitkaitis, D. (2023). Interrater agreement between student and teacher assessments of endotracheal intubation skills in a self-directed simulation learning environment. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 256–256. DOI:

Marinho, P., Fernandes, P., & Pimentel, F. (2021). The Digital Portfolio as an Assessment Strategy for Learning in Higher Education. Distance Education, 42(2), 253–267. DOI:

Martos-Garcia, D., Usabiaga, O., & Valencia-Peris, A. (2017). Students’ Perception on Formative and Shared Assessment: Connecting two Universities through the Blogosphere. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 64–70. DOI:

McBain, B., Drew, A., James, C., Phelan, L., Harris, K. M., & Archer, J. (2016). Student Experience of Oral Communication Assessment Tasks Online from a Multi-Disciplinary Trial. Education & Training, 58(2), 134–149. DOI:

McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment: Student Views and Staff Reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–16. DOI:

McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–141. DOI:

McCune, V. (2018). Experienced academics’ pedagogical development in higher education: Time, technologies, and conversations. Oxford Review of Education, 44(3), 307–321. DOI:

McDowell, S. A. C. (2020). Asynchronous Online Assessment of Physical Chemistry Concepts in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3256–3259. DOI:

Meccawy, Z., Meccawy, M., & Alsobhi, A. (2021). Assessment in “survival mode”: Student and faculty perceptions of online assessment practices in HE during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–24. DOI:

Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova, B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–21. DOI:

Melo, G., Monteza, D., Colson, G., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2022). How to assess? Student preferences for methods to assess experiential learning: A best-worst scaling approach. PloS One, 17(10), e0276745–e0276745. DOI:

Millar, R., & Manoharan, S. (2021). Repeat individualized assessment using isomorphic questions: A novel approach to increase peer discussion and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–15. DOI:

Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233–248. DOI:

Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. DOI:

Montenegro-Rueda, M., Luque-de la Rosa, A., Sarasola Sanchez-Serrano, J. L., & Fernandez-Cerero, J. (2021). Assessment in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(19), 10509. DOI:

Moorhouse, B., & Kohnke, L. (2022). Conducting formative assessment during synchronous online lessons: University teachers’ challenges and pedagogical strategies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(3). DOI:

Morales-Arsenal, R., & Pinar-Pérez, J. M. (2022). How to Design an Efficient Post-pandemic Online Exam in Management Science: A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach. In LECT NOTE DATA ENG (Vol. 145, pp. 769–783). Springer International Publishing. DOI:

Moreno-Ruiz, L., Castellanos-Nieves, D., Braileanu, B., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, E., Sanchez-De La Rosa, J., Groenwald, C., & Gonzalez-Gonzalez, C. (2019). Combining Flipped Classroom, Project-Based Learning, and Formative Assessment Strategies in Engineering Studies. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 1673–1683.

Morgan, K., Adams, E., Elsobky, T., Darr, A., & Brackbill, M. (2021). Moving Assessment Online: Experiences within a School of Pharmacy. Online Learning, 25(1), 245–252. DOI:

Mostafa, L. (2023). Evaluating university E-assessment in Egypt: A teachers’ perspective. Journal of Education for Business, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–9.

Nacheva-Skopalik, L., & Green, S. (2016). Intelligent adaptable e-assessment for inclusive e-learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 11(1), 21–34. DOI:

Nagle, L., O’ Connell, M., & Farrelly, T. (2019). A Gap in Governance: Acknowledging the Challenges of Organic ePortfolio Implementation. Educational Media International, 56(4), 328–342. DOI:

Ndibalema, P. (2021). Online Assessment in the Era of Digital Natives in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 443–463. DOI:

Nel, C., & Marais, E. (2020). Preservice Teachers Use of WhatsApp to Explain Subject Content to School Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(5), 629–641. DOI:

Nguyen, J. G., Keuseman, K. J., & Humston, J. J. (2020). Minimize Online Cheating for Online Assessments During COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3429–3435. DOI:

Nieminen, J. H., Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Designing the digital in authentic assessment: Is it fit for purpose? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(0), 1–15. DOI:

Nikolaeva, S., & Korol, T. (2021). Prospective Philologists’ Translation Assessment Triangulation: Screen Video Recording and Think Aloud Protocol Combination. Advanced Education, 18, 30–41. DOI:

Nurmikko-Fuller, T., & Hart, I. E. (2020). Constructive Alignment and Authentic Assessment in a Media-Rich Undergraduate Course. Educational Media International, 57(2), 167–182. DOI:

Nutbrown, S., Higgins, C., & Beesley, S. (2016). Measuring the Impact of High Quality Instant Feedback on Learning. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 130–139.

O’Donnell, M. (2020). Assessment as and of Digital Practice: Building Productive Digital Literacies. In M. Bearman, P. Dawson, R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, & D. Boud (Eds.), Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World (Vol. 7, pp. 111–125). Springer International Publishing.

Ockey, G. J., Timpe-Laughlin, V., Davis, L., & Gu, L. (2019). Exploring the Potential of a Video-Mediated Interactive Speaking Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-19-05. ETS Research Report Series. DOI:

Ogange, B. O., Agak, J. O., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29–39. DOI:

Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E. (2019). Pedagogical Approaches for E-Assessment with Authentication and Authorship Verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3264–3282. DOI:

Onodipe, G., & Ayadi, M. F. (2020). Using Smartphones for Formative Assessment in the Flipped Classroom. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 23.

OpenAI. (2023).

Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 95, 254–269. DOI:

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. DOI:

Papapanou, M., Routsi, E., Tsamakis, K., Fotis, L., Marinos, G., Lidoriki, I., Karamanou, M., Papaioannou, T. G., Tsiptsios, D., Smyrnis, N., Rizos, E., & Schizas, D. (2022). Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(1159), 321–327. DOI:

Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128–138. DOI:

Paris, B. (2022). Instructors’ Perspectives of Challenges and Barriers to Providing Effective Feedback. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 10, 1–13. DOI:

Pauna, M. (2017). Calculus Courses’ Assessment Data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(2), 12–21. DOI:

Pavlič, L., Beranič, T., Brezočnik, L., & Heričko, M. (2022). Towards a novel catalog of assessment patterns for distant education in the information technology domain. Computers & Education, 182, 104470. DOI:

Pellegrino, J. W., & Quellmalz, E. S. (2010). Perspectives on the Integration of Technology and Assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 119–134. DOI:

Penn, M., & Mavuru, L. (2020). Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Reception and Attitudes towards Virtual Laboratory Experiments in Life Sciences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19, 1092–1105. DOI:

Perez-Torregrosa, A., Gallego-Arrufat, M., & Cebrian-de-la-Serna, M. (2022). Digital rubric-based assessment of oral presentation competence with technological resources for preservice teachers. Estudios Sobre Educacion, 43, 177–198. DOI:

Petrovic, J., Pale, P., & Jeren, B. (2017). Online formative assessments in a digital signal processing course: Effects of feedback type and content difficulty on students learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3047–3061. DOI:

Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and Alternative Assessments in ELT: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. rEFLections, 25(1), 61–84. DOI:

Pires Pereira, I. S., Fernandes, E. L., & Flores, M. A. (2021). Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Insights from a Formative Intervention Approach Involving Online Feedback. Education Sciences, 11(8), 400. DOI:

Pitts, W., & Lehner-Quam, A. (2019). Engaging the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education as a Lens for Assessment in an ePortfolio Social Pedagogy Ecosystem for Science Teacher Education. International Journal of ePortfolio, 9(1), 29–44.

Podsiad, M., & Havard, B. (2020). Faculty Acceptance of the Peer Assessment Collaboration Evaluation Tool: A Quantitative Study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1381–1407. DOI:

Porter, G. W. (2022). Collaborative Online Annotation: Pedagogy, Assessment and Platform Comparisons. Frontiers in Education, 7. DOI:

Puentedura, R. R. (2009). Building Transformation: An Introduction to the SAMR Model. In

Purkayastha, S., Surapaneni, A. K., Maity, P., Rajapuri, A. S., & Gichoya, J. W. (2019). Critical Components of Formative Assessment in Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Online Labs. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(2), 79–92. DOI:

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Routledge. DOI:

Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. DOI:

Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 Emergency: Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of Academic Integrity in the Transition to Online Exams at Three Australian Universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. DOI:

Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 101–111. DOI:

Rensaa, R. J. (2023). Assessment considerations during lockdown in Norway: An exploratory case study with focus on misconducts in university mathematics. Cogent Education, 10(1). DOI:

Robertson, S. N., Humphrey, S. M., & Steele, J. P. (2019). Using Technology Tools for Formative Assessments. Journal of Educators Online, 16(2). DOI:

Rodrigues, C., Costa, J. M., & Moro, S. (2022). Assessment Patterns during Portuguese Emergency Remote Teaching. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(5), 3131. DOI:

Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Holzer, A., & Gillet, D. (2020). Instruction, Student Engagement, and Learning Outcomes: A Case Study Using Anonymous Social Media in a Face-to-Face Classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(4), 718–733. DOI:

Rolim, C., & Isaias, P. (2019). Examining the use of e-assessment in higher education: Teachers and students’ viewpoints. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1785–1800. DOI:

Rowlett, P. (2022). Partially-automated individualized assessment of higher education mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1413–1434. DOI:

Sa’di, R. A., Abdelraziq, A., & Sharadgah, T. A. (2021). E-Assessment at Jordan’s Universities in the Time of the COVID-19 Lockdown: Challenges and Solutions. Arab World English Journal, 37–54. DOI:

Sabbaghan, S., Peglar, M., & Tweedie, M. G. (2019). The Multimodal Effects of Voice-Based Asynchronous Technology-Mediated Communication on EAP Speaking Performance. TESL Canada Journal, 36(3), 82–109. DOI:

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. DOI:

Sahin, M. (2019). Classroom Response Systems as a Formative Assessment Tool: Investigation into Students’ Perceived Usefulness and Behavioural Intention. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 693–705. DOI:

Santos, H. (2022). COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Student Grades of a University Engineering Course: A Psychometric Study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(4), 1–9. DOI:

Sargent, J., & Lynch, S. (2021). ’None of my other teachers know my face/emotions/thoughts’: Digital technology and democratic assessment practices in higher education physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(5), 693–705. DOI:

Sbaffi, L., & Zhao, X. (2022). Evaluating a pedagogical approach to promoting academic integrity in higher education: An online induction program. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1009305–1009305. DOI:

Schrum, K. (2022). Developing student capacity to produce digital scholarship in the humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(2), 158–175. DOI:

Schultz, M., Young, K., K. Gunning, T., & Harvey, M. L. (2022). Defining and measuring authentic assessment: A case study in the context of tertiary science. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 77–94. DOI:

Scott, M., & Unsworth, J. (2018). Matching final assessment to employability: Developing a digital viva as an end of programme assessment. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 373–384. DOI:

Selwyn, N. (2016). Minding our language: Why education and technology is full of bullshit … and what might be done about it. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 437–443. DOI:

Senel, S., & Senel, H. C. (2021). Remote Assessment in Higher Education during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 181–199. DOI:

Shraim, K. (2019). Online Examination Practices in Higher Education Institutions: Learners’ Perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 185–196. DOI:

Simper, N. (2020). Assessment thresholds for academic staff: Constructive alignment and differentiation of standards. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1016–1030. DOI:

Slade, C., Lawrie, G., Taptamat, N., Browne, E., Sheppard, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2022). Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: Disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 588–605. DOI:

Snekalatha, S., Marzuk, S. M., Meshram, S. A., Maheswari, K. U., Sugapriya, G., & Sivasharan, K. (2021). Medical students’ perception of the reliability, usefulness and feasibility of unproctored online formative assessment tests. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 84–88. DOI:

Song, B., Lim, K., & Kwon, H. (2021). Insights From Three Online Art Educators: Strategies for Instruction, Interaction, and Assessment. Art Education, 74(4), 16–21. DOI:

Sözen, E., & Güven, U. (2019). The Effect of Online Assessments on Students’ Attitudes towards Undergraduate-Level Geography Courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1–8. DOI:

Spector, J., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., Dona, K., Eichhorn, K., Fluck, A., Huang, R., Bridges, S., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Gui, X., Deneen, C., San Diego, J., & Gibson, D. (2016). Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment for 21st Century Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 58–71.

Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). American Educational Research Association.

St-Onge, C., Ouellet, K., Lakhal, S., Dubé, T., & Marceau, M. (2022). COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 349–366. DOI:

Sucahyo, D., Hermagustiana, I., & Rusmawaty, D. (2022). Students’ Online Assessments in Higher Education Context: Indonesian Teacher Educators’ Voice. Script Journal, 7(2), 367–379. DOI:

Sudakova, N., Savina, T., Masalimova, A., Mikhaylovsky, M., Karandeeva, L., & Zhdanov, S. (2022). Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3). DOI:

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. DOI:

Tailab, M. M. K., & Marsh, N. Y. (2020). Use of Self-Assessment of Video Recording to Raise Students’ Awareness of Development of Their Oral Presentation Skills. Higher Education Studies, 10(1), 16–28. DOI:

Tejaswi, P., Venkatramaphanikumar, S., & Venkata Krishna Kishore, K. (2023). Proctor net: An AI framework for suspicious activity detection in online proctored examinations. Measurement : Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 206, 112266. DOI:

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

Thibodeaux, T., Harapnuik, D., Cummings, C., & Dolce, J. (2020). Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Factors That Contributed to ePortfolios Persistence beyond the Program of Study. International Journal of ePortfolio, 10(1), 19–32.

Thompson, C. J. (2009). Educational Statistics Authentic Learning CAPSULES: Community Action Projects for Students Utilizing Leadership and E-based Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1). DOI:

Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. DOI:

Tsai, N. W. (2016). Assessment of Students’ Learning Behavior and Academic Misconduct in a Student-Pulled Online Learning and Student-Governed Testing Environment: A Case Study. Journal of Education for Business, 91(7), 387–392. DOI:

Tsai, Y.-S., Perrotta, C., & Gaševic, D. (2020). Empowering Learners with Personalised Learning Approaches? Agency, Equity and Transparency in the Context of Learning Analytics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 554–567. DOI:

Valizadeh, M. (2022). Cheating in online learning programs: Learners’ perceptions and solutions. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE, 23(1), 195–209. DOI:

Veale, C. G. L. (2022). Considering the Impact of Image-Based Search Engines for Online Chemistry Assessments. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1497–1502. DOI:

Venville, A., Cleak, H., & Bould, E. (2017). Exploring the potential of a collaborative web-based e-portfolio in social work field education. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 185–196. DOI:

Vick, N. (2021). The Video Essay. Honors in Practice, 17, 252–254.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.; A. R. Luria, Trans.). Harvard University Press.

Wang, P., & Jeffrey, R. (2017). Listening to learners: An investigation into college students’ attitudes towards the adoption of e-portfolios in English assessment and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1451–1463. DOI:

Watson, C., Wilson, A., Drew, V., & Thompson, T. L. (2017). Small data, online learning and assessment practices in higher education: A case study of failure? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1030–1045. DOI:

Way, K. A., Burrell, L., D’Allura, L., & Ashford-Rowe, K. (2021). Empirical investigation of authentic assessment theory: An application in online courses using mimetic simulation created in university learning management ecosystems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 17–35. DOI:

WEF. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum.

Weir, I., Gwynllyw, R., & Henderson, K. (2021). A Case Study in the E-Assessment of Statistics for Non-Specialists. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(2). DOI:

West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the Assessment Experience: Improving Student Perceptions, Engagement and Understanding Using Online Video Feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400–410. DOI:

Whitelock, D., Edwards, C., & Okada, A. (2020). Can e-Authentication Raise the Confidence of Both Students and Teachers in Qualifications Granted through the e-Assessment Process? Journal of Learning for Development, 7(1), 46–60. DOI:

Wilkie, B., & Liefeith, A. (2022). Student experiences of live synchronised video feedback in formative assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 403–416. DOI:

Wilson, C. B., Slade, C., Kirby, M. M., Downer, T., Fisher, M. B., & Nuessler, S. (2018). Digital Ethics and the Use of ePortfolio: A Scoping Review of the Literature. International Journal of ePortfolio, 8(2), 115–125.

Woldeab, D., & Brothen, T. (2019). 21st Century Assessment: Online Proctoring, Test Anxiety, and Student Performance. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1).

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. DOI:

Xu, H. (2022). Interactive Self-Reporting as Behavioural Cue Elicitor for Online-Classroom Assessment. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 232. DOI:

Xu, X., Kauer, S., & Tupy, S. (2016). Multiple-choice questions: Tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(2), 147–158. DOI:

Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). The Role of e-Portfolios in Supporting Productive Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276–1286. DOI:

Zheng, C., Wang, L., & Chai, C. (2021). Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: Effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning. DOI:




How to Cite

Madland, C., Irvine, V., DeLuca, C., & Bulut, O. (2024). Technology-Integrated Assessment: A Literature Review. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 4(1), 1–48.



Research Articles