Technology-Integrated Assessment: A Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2024.4.1.57Keywords:
assessment, technology, technology-integrated assessment, digital learning, higher education, technology-integrated learning, educational technologyAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of the scholarly literature between 2016 and 2023 on the impact of classroom technology on higher education instructors’ assessment practices through the lens of the assessment design in a digital world framework (Bearman et al., 2022). Specifically, the paper focuses on (a) describing the assessment design in a digital world framework, (b) identifying the scope and breadth of the literature relating to technology-integrated assessment, and (c) highlighting any gaps between the Bearman et al. model and the literature. This paper marks an important step in extending our understanding of the factors influencing instructors who integrate technology into their assessment practice and promoting ethical and equitable approaches to technology-integrated assessment in higher education.
References
Adama, E. A., Graf, A., Adusei-Asante, K., & Afrifa-Yamoah, E. (2023). COVID-19 and alternative assessments in higher education: Implications for academic integrity among nursing and social science students. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00129-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00129-0
Adanir, G. A., Ismailova, R., Omuraliev, A., & Muhametjanova, G. (2020). Learners’ Perceptions of Online Exams: A Comparative Study in Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4769-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4679
Adiguzel, T., Varank, I., Erkoc, M., & Buyukimdat, M. (2017). Examining a Web-Based Peer Feedback System in an Introductory Computer Literacy Course. Eurasia Journal Of Mathematics Science And Technology Education, 13(1), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00614a
Aini, Q. (2020). Digitalization of Smart Student Assessment Quality in Era 4.0. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(1.2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/3891.22020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/3891.22020
Aji, A. A., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). Assessing Students During Online Learning: A Case Study on a Linguistic Subject Teacher’s Experience. Language Circle (Semarang ), 16(2), 264–273. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v16i2.31643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v16i2.31643
Almossa, S. Y. (2021). University students’ perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163–7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8
Almossa, S. Y., & Alzahrani, S. M. (2022). Lessons on maintaining assessment integrity during COVID-19. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00112-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-022-00112-1
Alsabhan, W. (2023). Student Cheating Detection in Higher Education by Implementing Machine Learning and LSTM Techniques. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 23(8), 4149. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084149
Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students’ Perceptions of E-Assessment at Saudi Electronic University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 16(1), 147–153. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v16i1/16113.pdf
Alshamsi, A., Zahavich, A., & El-Farra, S. (2021). Why Graded Assessment for Undergraduates during the COVID-19 Lockdown? An Experience Introspection. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(2), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.2.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.2.04
Altowairiki, N. (2021). Online Collaborative Learning: Analyzing the Process through Living the Experience. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 413–427. https://www.ijte.net/index.php/ijte/article/view/95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.95
Aluko, F. R., & Omidire, M. F. (2020). A Critical Review of Student Assessment Practices in Distance Education in an Emerging Economy: Benchmarking Practices against Policy. Africa Education Review, 17(5), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1920842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2021.1920842
Alvi, A. H., Bilal, S. M., & Alvi, A. A. R. (2021). Technology, Pedagogy & Assessment: Challenges of COVID-19-Imposed E-Teaching of ESP to Saudi Female PY Students. Arab World English Journal, 334–353. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3851774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.25
Arsenis, P., Flores, M., & Petropoulou, D. (2022). Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 47(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1897086 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1897086
Azizi, Z. (2022). Fairness in assessment practices in online education: Iranian University English teachers’ perceptions. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00164-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00164-7
Babo, R., V. Babo, L., T Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2020). E- Assessment with Multiple-Choice Questions: A 5 Year Study of Students’ Opinions and Experience. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 19, 001–029. https://doi.org/gmbvnn DOI: https://doi.org/10.28945/4491
Baboolal-Frank, R. (2021). Emergency Remote Learning during the Pandemic from a South African Perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00087-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00087-5
Bader, M., Iversen, S., & Burner, T. (2021). Students’ perceptions and use of a new digital tool in teacher education. Nordic Journal Of Digital Literacy, 16(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2021-01-03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2021-01-03
Badke, W. (2023). AI challenges to information literacy. Computers in Libraries, 43(3), 41–42. https://www.infotoday.com/cilmag/apr23/Badke--AI-Challenges-to-Information-Literacy.shtml
Balasubramanian, B., DeSantis, C., & Gulotta, M. (2020). Assessment à la Mode: Implementing an Adaptable Large-Scale Multivariant Online Deferred-Grade Exam for Virtual Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(12), 4297–4302. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00767 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00767
Baso, Y. S., Murtadho, N., -, S., Maulani, H., Agussalim, A., -, H., Fadlan, A., & Ramadhan, I. (2023). Reducing Cheating in Online Exams Through the Proctor Test Model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140139
BC Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Training. (2022). Digital Learning Advisory Committee Draft Recommendations. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/education/post-secondary-education/institution-resources-administration/digital-learning-strategy/digital_learning_strategy.pdf
Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Bennett, S., Hall, M., Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Joughin, G. (2017). How university teachers design assessments: A cross-disciplinary study. Higher Education, 74(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/gbhr94 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7
Bearman, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., Bennett, S., Hall, M., & Molloy, E. (2016). Support for assessment practice: Developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(5), 545–556. https://doi.org/gjsn3g DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217
Bearman, M., Nieminen, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Designing assessment in a digital world: An organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2069674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2069674
Belt, E. S., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2021). Video Use in Online and Blended Courses: A Qualitative Synthesis. Distance Education, 42(3), 410–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1954882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1954882
Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/cfv4kn DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12439
Bhute, V. J., Campbell, J., Kogelbauer, A., Shah, U. V., & Brechtelsbauer, C. (2020). Moving to Timed Remote Assessments: The Impact of COVID-19 on Year End Exams in Chemical Engineering at Imperial College London. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2760–2767. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00617
Biasutti, M. (2017). A coding scheme to analyse the online asynchronous discussion forums of university students. Technology Pedagogy And Education, 26(5), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1365753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1365753
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/fpnss4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bommineni, V. L., Bhagwagar, S., Balcarcel, D., Davatzikos, C., & Boyer, D. (2023). Performance of ChatGPT on the MCAT: The Road to Personalized and Equitable Premedical Learning [Preprint]. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.05.23286533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.05.23286533
Bopegedera, A. M. R. P. (2020). Using Familiar and New Assessment Tools in Physical Chemistry Courses During COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3260–3264. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00789
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
Brady, M., Devitt, A., & Kiersey, R. A. (2019). Academic Staff Perspectives on Technology for Assessment (TFA) in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3080–3098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12742
Broadfoot, P. (2016). Assessment for Twenty-First-Century Learning: The Challenges Ahead. In M. J. Spector, B. B. Lockee, & M. D. Childress (Eds.), Learning, Design, and Technology (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_64-1
Buczek-Zawila, A. (2021). Catering to Assessment Needs of Students of English – CALL to the Rescue? Teaching English with Technology, 21(2), 38–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12742
Bullock, A., Colvin, A. D., & Jackson, M. S. (2022). Zoom Fatigue in the Age of COVID-19. Journal of Social Work in the Global Community, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5590/JSWGC.2022.07.1.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5590/JSWGC.2022.07.1.01
Campbell, C., & Tran, T. (2021). Using an Implementation Trial of an ePortfolio System to Promote Student Learning through Self-Reflection: Leveraging the Success. Education Sciences, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060263
Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021). Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback. Research And Practice In Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00168-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00168-6
Celik, I., Gedrimiene, E., Silvola, A., & Muukkonen, H. (2022). Response of learning analytics to the online education challenges during pandemic: Opportunities and key examples in higher education. Policy Futures In Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221078401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221078401
Chadha, D., Maraj, M., & Kogelbauer, A. (2020). Opening up Assessment in the Age of COVID-19: Exploring the Utility of Online Open-Book Exams. Advances in Engineering Education, 8(4). https://advances.asee.org/opening-up-assessment-in-the-age-of-covid-19-exploring-the-utility-of-online-open-book-exams/
Chanpet, P., Chomsuwan, K., & Murphy, E. (2020). Online Project-Based Learning and Formative Assessment. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 25(3), 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9363-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9363-2
Clarke, J., & Boud, D. (2018). Refocusing portfolio assessment: Curating for feedback and portrayal. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1250664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1250664
Cleveland, R. (2018). Using Digital Portfolios: Reflection, Assessment & Employment. TechTrends, 62(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0262-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0262-0
Combrinck, M., & van Vollenhoven, W. (2020). Computer-assisted assessment: An old remedy for challenges in open distance learning. Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 22–34. http://ref.scielo.org/bh77hf
Cook, B. R., & Babon, A. (2017). Active Learning through Online Quizzes: Better Learning and Less (Busy) Work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1185772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1185772
Corral, D., Carpenter, S. K., Perkins, K., & Gentile, D. A. (2020). Assessing students’ use of optional online lecture reviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3618 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3618
Cosi, S., Voltas, N., Lazaro-Cantabrana, J., Morales, P., Calvo, M., Molina, S., & Quiroga, M. (2020). Formative assessment at university using digital technology tools. Profesorado, Revista de Currículum y Formación Del Profesorado, 24(1), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.9314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v24i1.9314
Dallas, B. K., McCarthy, A. K., & Long, G. (2016). Examining the Educational Benefits of and Attitudes toward Closed Captioning among Undergraduate Students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i2.19267
Dawson, P., & Henderson, M. (2017). How Does Technology Enable Scaling Up Assessment for Learning? In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (Vol. 5, pp. 209–222). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_14
De Brún, A., Rogers, L., Drury, A., & Gilmore, B. (2022). Evaluation of a formative peer assessment in research methods teaching using an online platform: A mixed methods pre-post study. Nurse Education Today, 108, 105166–105166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105166
de Lange, T., Møystad, A., & Torgersen, G. (2020). How Can Video-Based Assignments Integrate Practical and Conceptual Knowledge in Summative Assessment? Student Experiences from a Longitudinal Experiment. British Educational Research Journal, 46(6), 1279–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3632
Debuse, J. C. W., & Lawley, M. (2016). Benefits and Drawbacks of Computer-Based Assessment and Feedback Systems: Student and Educator Perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12232
del Gobbo, E., Guarino, A., Cafarelli, B., Grilli, L., & Limone, P. (2023). Automatic evaluation of open-ended questions for online learning. A systematic mapping. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 77, 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101258
DeMara, R., Tian, T., & Howard, W. (2019). Engineering assessment strata: A layered approach to evaluation spanning Bloom’s taxonomy of learning. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1147–1171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9812-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9812-5
Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., & Carless, D. (2018). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1281752
Dery, L. (2023). Forming a ranking from tied evaluations: A case of an online, interactive student peer assessment system. arXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.13774
DeWaard, H., & Roberts, V. (2021). Revisioning the potential of Freire’s principles of assessment: Influences on the art of assessment in open and online learning through blogging. Distance Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/gjvg5k
Di Lauro, F. (2020). ’If It Is Not in Wikipedia, Blame Yourself:’ Edit-a-thons as Vehicles for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 45(5), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750191
Dicks, A. P., Morra, B., & Quinlan, K. B. (2020). Lessons Learned from the COVID-19 Crisis: Adjusting Assessment Approaches within Introductory Organic Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3406–3412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00529
Dron, J. (2022). Educational technology: What it is and how it works. AI & Society, 37(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01195-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01195-z
Duncan, A., & Joyner, D. (2022). On the necessity (or lack thereof) of digital proctoring: Drawbacks, perceptions, and alternatives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1482–1496. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12700 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12700
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (Second edition). Corwin Press.
Ebert, J. G., Anderson, J. R., & Taylor, L. F. (2020). Enhancing Reflective Practice of Student Physical Therapists through Video-Assisted Self and Peer-Assessment: A Pilot Study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 32(1), 31–38. https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/ijtlhe-article-view.php?mid=3643
Egarter, S., Mutschler, A., & Brass, K. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on digital medical education: Compatibility of digital teaching and examinations with integrity and ethical principles. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00084-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00084-8
Elkhatat, A. M. (2023). Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: A study on text-matching capabilities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00137-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00137-0
Ellis, R., Bliuc, A.-M., & Han, F. (2021). Challenges in assessing the nature of effective collaboration in blended university courses. Australasian Journal Of Educational Technology, 37(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5576
Ellis, S., & Barber, J. (2016). Expanding and Personalising Feedback in Online Assessment: A Case Study in a School of Pharmacy. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 121–129. https://ojs.cumbria.ac.uk/index.php/prhe/article/view/327
Farrell, O. (2020). From Portafoglio to Eportfolio: The Evolution of Portfolio in Higher Education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.574
Fernandez-Ferrer, M., & Cano, E. (2016). The influence of the internet for pedagogical innovation: Using twitter to promote online collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0021-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0021-2
Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing (Leeds), 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Forkan, A. R. M., Kang, Y.-B., Jayaraman, P. P., Du, H., Thomson, S., Kollias, E., & Wieland, N. (2023). VideoDL: Video-Based Digital Learning Framework Using AI Question Generation and Answer Assessment. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 16(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v16i1.35207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v16i1.35207
Forkosh-Baruch, A., Phillips, M., & Smits, A. (2021). Reconsidering Teachers’ Pedagogical Reasoning and Decision Making for Technology Integration as an Agenda for Policy, Practice and Research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2209–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09966-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09966-7
Fuller, R., Goddard, V., Nadarajah, V., Treasure-Jones, T., Yeates, P., Scott, K., Webb, A., Valter, K., & Pyorala, E. (2022). Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations. Medical Teacher, 44(8), 836–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2083489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2083489
Gallavan, N., Huffman, S., & Shaw, E. (2017). Ensuring Ethics and Equity With Classroom Assessments and Mobile Technology: Advancing Online Education. In M. Mills & D. Wake (Eds.), Empowering Learners With Mobile Open-Access Learning Initiatives (pp. 220–241). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2122-8.ch011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2122-8.ch011
Gamage, K. A. A., Pradeep, R. G. G. R., & de Silva, E. K. (2022). Rethinking Assessment: The Future of Examinations in Higher Education. Sustainability, 14(6), 3552. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063552
Gamage, K. A. A., Silva, E. K. de, & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online Delivery and Assessment during COVID-19: Safeguarding Academic Integrity. Education Sciences, 10(11), 301. https://doi.org/gmbvx2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110301
García López, A., & García Mazarío, F. (2016). The Use of Technology in a Model of Formative Assessment. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.190
Garcia-Alberti, M., Suarez, F., Chiyon, I., & Mosquera Feijoo, J. C. (2021). Challenges and Experiences of Online Evaluation in Courses of Civil Engineering during the Lockdown Learning Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020059
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Gikandi, J. (2021). Enhancing E-Learning Through Integration of Online Formative Assessment and Teaching Presence. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 11(2), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2021040104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2021040104
Gil-Jaurena, I., Domínguez-Figaredo, D., & Ballesteros-Velázquez, B. (2022). Learning outcomes based assessment in distance higher education. A case study. Open Learning, 37(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1757419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1757419
Goertler, S., & Gacs, A. (2018). Assessment in Online German: Assessment Methods and Results. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 51(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tger.12071
González-Gómez, D., Jeong, J. S., & Cañada-Cañada, F. (2020). Examining the Effect of an Online Formative Assessment Tool (OFAT) of Students’ Motivation and Achievement for a University Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/gmbvz6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.401
Gradisek, P., & Polak, A. (2021). Insights into learning and examination experience of higher education students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sodobna Pedagogika-Journal Of Contemporary Educational Studies, 72, 286–307.
Grier, D., Lindt, S. F., & Miller, S. C. (2021). Formative Assessment with Game-Based Technology. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.97 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.97
Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: A case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w
Gudiño Paredes, S., Jasso Peña, F. de J., & de La Fuente Alcazar, J. M. (2021). Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education? Distance Education, 42(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1910495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1910495
Gunning, T. K., Conlan, X. A., Collins, P. K., Bellgrove, A., Antlej, K., Cardilini, A. P. A., & Fraser, C. L. (2022). Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00340-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00340-y
Gupta, M. M., Jankie, S., Pancholi, S. S., Talukdar, D., Sahu, P. K., & Sa, B. (2020). Asynchronous Environment Assessment: A Pertinent Option for Medical and Allied Health Profession Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(12), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120352
Gupta, T., Shree, A., Chanda, P., & Banerjee, A. (2023). Online assessment techniques adopted by the university teachers amidst COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100579–100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100579
Gusev, M., Ristov, S., & Armenski, G. (2016). Technologies for interactive learning and assessment content development. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 14(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2016010102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2016010102
Haber, N., & Mitchell, T. N. (2017). Using Formative & Summative Assessment to Evaluate Library Instruction in an Online First Year Writing Course. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 11(3-4), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2017.1324549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1533290X.2017.1324549
Haider, A. S., Hussein, R. F., & Saed, H. A. (2022). Jordanian University Instructors’ Practices and Perceptions of Online Testing in the COVID-19 Era. Frontiers in Education (Lausanne), 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.856129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.856129
Haj-Yahya, A., & Olsher, S. (2022). Preservice teachers’ experiences with digital formative assessment in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1751–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1842527
Halaweh, M. (2021). Are Universities Using the Right Assessment Tools during the Pandemic and Crisis Times? Higher Learning Research Communications, 11, 1–9. https://dio.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1184
Hartmann, J., Schwenzow, J., & Witte, M. (2023). The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4316084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4316084
Hébert, C. (2021). Online Remote Proctoring Software in the Neoliberal Institution: Measurement, Accountability, and Testing Culture. In Education, 27(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.37119/ojs2021.v27i1.507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37119/ojs2021.v27i1.507
Hedtrich, S., & Graulich, N. (2018). Using Software Tools To Provide Students in Large Classes with Individualized Formative Feedback. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(12), 2263–2267. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00173
Herbert, K., Demskoi, D., & Cullis, K. (2019). Creating mathematics formative assessments using LaTeX, PDF forms and computer algebra. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4539
Hilliger, I., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Alexandron, G., & Gašević, D. (2022). Trustworthy remote assessments: A typology of pedagogical and technological strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12755
hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/para.1994.17.3.270
Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change (B. Bell, J. Gaventa, & J. Peters, Eds.). Temple University Press.
Hussein, M. J., Yusuf, J., Deb, A. S., Fong, L., & Naidu, S. (2020). An Evaluation of Online Proctoring Tools. Open Praxis, 12(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/gmbv3m DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.4.1113
Ibarra-Saiz, M. S., Rodriguez-Gomez, G., Lukas-Mujika, J. F., & Santos-Berrondo, A. (2023). Methods and instruments to assess learning outcomes in master’s degrees. Analysis of teachers’ perception of their evaluative practice. Educación XX1, 26(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.33443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.33443
Jaam, M., Nazar, Z., Rainkie, D. C., Hassan, D. A., Hussain, F. N., Kassab, S. E., & Agouni, A. (2021). Using Assessment Design Decision Framework in understanding the impact of rapid transition to remote education on student assessment in health-related colleges: A qualitative study. PloS One, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254444
Janse van Rensburg, C., Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2022). Developing digital creativity through authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 857–877. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1968791 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1968791
Jiao, H., & Lissitz, R. W. (2020). What Hath the Coronavirus Brought to Assessment? Unprecedented Challenges in Educational Assessment in 2020 and Years to Come. Educational Measurement, Issues and Practice, 39(3), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12363
Jopp, R. (2020). A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637
Jorm, C., Roberts, C., Gordon, C., Nisbet, G., & Roper, L. (2019). Time for University Educators to Embrace Student Videography. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(6), 673–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1590528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1590528
Karim, M. A. (2021). Hybrid and Online Synchronous Delivery of Environmental Engineering during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study on Perception, Attitude, and Assessment. European Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/gmbv26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9688
Kerrigan, J., Cochran, G., Tabanli, S., Charnley, M., & Mulvey, S. (2022). Post-COVID Changes to Assessment Practices: A Case Study of Undergraduate STEM Recitations. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221118392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221118392
Ketchum, C., Phompheng, E., Yeats, C., LaFave, D., & Hardy, J. (2022). The Impact of Video Feedback on Student Assessments and Performance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 36(4), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2073113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2073113
Ketonen, L., Lehtinen, A., & Koskinen, P. (2023). Assessment designs of instructional labs: A literature review and a design model. Physical Review. Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020601
Khajeloo, M., Birt, J. A., Kenderes, E. M., Siegel, M. A., Nguyen, H., Ngo, L. T., Mordhorst, B. R., & Cummings, K. (2022). Challenges and Accomplishments of Practicing Formative Assessment: A Case Study of College Biology Instructors’ Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10149-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10149-8
Khalaf, K., El-Kishawi, M., Moufti, M., & Al Kawas, S. (2020). Introducing a comprehensive high-stake online exam to final-year dental students during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluation of its effectiveness. Medical Education Online, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1826861 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1826861
Khokhar, A. (2022). Teaching during COVID-19 Pandemic: Students’ Experiences, Perceptions and Lessons for Higher Education Institutes. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 38(1-3), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2022/38.1-3.1233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31901/24566322.2022/38.1-3.1233
Khosravi, H., Shum, S. B., Chen, G., Conati, C., Tsai, Y.-S., Kay, J., Knight, S., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Sadiq, S., & Gašević, D. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074
Kim, V. (2018). Technology-Enhanced Feedback on Student Writing in the English-Medium Instruction Classroom. English Teaching, 73(4), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.4.201812.29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.4.201812.29
Kloppers, M., & Potgieter, E. (2023). Your feedback procedure, my inspiration: Enhancing student achievement through assessment. South African Journal of Education, 43(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n1a2124
Knight, G. L., & Drysdale, T. D. (2020). The future of higher education (HE) hangs on innovating our assessment - but are we ready, willing and able? Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1771610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1771610
Koneru, I. (2017). Exploring Moodle Functionality For Managing Open Distance Learning E-Assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(4), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340402
Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2019). Students’ Beliefs Regarding the Use of E-portfolio to Enhance Cognitive Skills in a Blended Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies In Learning, 14(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i02.8288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i02.8288
Korhonen, A.-M., Ruhalahti, S., Lakkala, M., & Veermans, M. (2020). Vocational Student Teachers’ Self-Reported Experiences in Creating ePortfolios. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 7(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.3.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.7.3.2
Köroglu, Z. Çetin. (2021). Using Digital Formative Assessment to Evaluate EFL Learners’ English Speaking Skills. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 22, 103–123. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.1001
Kumar, R. (2020). Assessing Higher Education in the COVID-19 Era. Brock Education: A Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 29(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v29i2.841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v29i2.841
Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 5(3). http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i3.290
Landi, A. K., & Minden, K. (2022). Metacognitive assessments for undergraduate mathematics courses in the time of covid-19. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2022.2106603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2022.2106603
Lapena-Manero, P., Garcia-Casuso, C., Miguel Montenegro-Cooper, J., King, R. W., & Behrens, E. M. (2022). An Open-Source System for Generating and Computer Grading Traditional Non-Coding Assignments. Electronics (Basel), 11(6), 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11060917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11060917
Law, Y. K., Tobin, R. W., Wilson, N. R., & Brandon, L. A. (2020). Improving Student Success by Incorporating Instant-Feedback Questions and Increased Proctoring in Online Science and Mathematics Courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 9, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v9i1.29169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v9i1.29169
Lee, A. V. Y., Luco, A. C., & Tan, S. C. (2023). A Human-Centric Automated Essay Scoring and Feedback System for the Development of Ethical Reasoning. Educational Technology & Society, 26(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0011
Lee, V., Lam, P., Lo, J., Lee, J., & Li, J. (2022). Rethinking online assessment from university students’ perspective in COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2082079
Lei, C., & Chan, C. (2018). Developing metadiscourse through reflective assessment in knowledge building environments. Computers & Education, 126, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.006
Lilley, M., Meere, J., & Barker, T. (2016). Remote Live Invigilation: A Pilot Study. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2016(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.408
Lipnevich, A. A., Guskey, T. R., Murano, D. M., & Smith, J. K. (2020). What do grades mean? Variation in grading criteria in American college and university courses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(5), 480–500. https://doi.org/ghjw3k DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1799190
Lucas, K. L. (2021). The Use of 3-D Modeling and Printing to Teach the Central Dogma of Molecular Biology. Science Activities: Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms, 58(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2021.1918048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2021.1918048
Luckin, R., Clark, W., Avramides, K., Hunter, J., & Oliver, M. (2017). Using teacher inquiry to support technology-enhanced formative assessment: A review of the literature to inform a new method. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1121152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1121152
Maboe, K. A., & Tomas, N. (2023). Online assessments and COVID-19: A qualitative study of undergraduate nursing students in Southern Africa. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 19, 100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100590
Madland, C., Ofosuhene, M., & Adkins, J. (2022). Digital Platforms and Algorithmic Erasure: What are the Implications? OTESSA Conference 2022. https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.137
Mahabeer, P., & Akoo, F. (2021). Connecting assessment and feedback: A customised and personalised experience for knowledge-building. Journal of Education, 83, 87–110. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i83a05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i83a05
Mankute, A., Juozapaviciene, L., Stucinskas, J., Dambrauskas, Z., Dobozinskas, P., Sinz, E., Rodgers, D. L., Pukenyte, E., Kumpaitiene, B., & Vaitkaitis, D. (2023). Interrater agreement between student and teacher assessments of endotracheal intubation skills in a self-directed simulation learning environment. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 256–256. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04242-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04242-z
Marinho, P., Fernandes, P., & Pimentel, F. (2021). The Digital Portfolio as an Assessment Strategy for Learning in Higher Education. Distance Education, 42(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911628 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1911628
Martos-Garcia, D., Usabiaga, O., & Valencia-Peris, A. (2017). Students’ Perception on Formative and Shared Assessment: Connecting two Universities through the Blogosphere. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.194
McBain, B., Drew, A., James, C., Phelan, L., Harris, K. M., & Archer, J. (2016). Student Experience of Oral Communication Assessment Tasks Online from a Multi-Disciplinary Trial. Education & Training, 58(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2014-0124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2014-0124
McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The Effectiveness of Formative Assessment: Student Views and Staff Reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761
McCarthy, J. (2017). Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/f99r6r DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615
McCune, V. (2018). Experienced academics’ pedagogical development in higher education: Time, technologies, and conversations. Oxford Review of Education, 44(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389712 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389712
McDowell, S. A. C. (2020). Asynchronous Online Assessment of Physical Chemistry Concepts in the Time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3256–3259. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00611
Meccawy, Z., Meccawy, M., & Alsobhi, A. (2021). Assessment in “survival mode”: Student and faculty perceptions of online assessment practices in HE during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00083-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00083-9
Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova, B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x
Melo, G., Monteza, D., Colson, G., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2022). How to assess? Student preferences for methods to assess experiential learning: A best-worst scaling approach. PloS One, 17(10), e0276745–e0276745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276745
Millar, R., & Manoharan, S. (2021). Repeat individualized assessment using isomorphic questions: A novel approach to increase peer discussion and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00257-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00257-y
Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087
Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
Montenegro-Rueda, M., Luque-de la Rosa, A., Sarasola Sanchez-Serrano, J. L., & Fernandez-Cerero, J. (2021). Assessment in Higher Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 13(19), 10509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910509
Moorhouse, B., & Kohnke, L. (2022). Conducting formative assessment during synchronous online lessons: University teachers’ challenges and pedagogical strategies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2065993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2022.2065993
Morales-Arsenal, R., & Pinar-Pérez, J. M. (2022). How to Design an Efficient Post-pandemic Online Exam in Management Science: A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach. In LECT NOTE DATA ENG (Vol. 145, pp. 769–783). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10385-8_55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10385-8_55
Moreno-Ruiz, L., Castellanos-Nieves, D., Braileanu, B., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, E., Sanchez-De La Rosa, J., Groenwald, C., & Gonzalez-Gonzalez, C. (2019). Combining Flipped Classroom, Project-Based Learning, and Formative Assessment Strategies in Engineering Studies. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 1673–1683. https://www.ijee.ie/latestissues/Vol35-6A/11_ijee3829.pdf
Morgan, K., Adams, E., Elsobky, T., Darr, A., & Brackbill, M. (2021). Moving Assessment Online: Experiences within a School of Pharmacy. Online Learning, 25(1), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2580 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2580
Mostafa, L. (2023). Evaluating university E-assessment in Egypt: A teachers’ perspective. Journal of Education for Business, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2023.2208813
Nacheva-Skopalik, L., & Green, S. (2016). Intelligent adaptable e-assessment for inclusive e-learning. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 11(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2016010102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2016010102
Nagle, L., O’ Connell, M., & Farrelly, T. (2019). A Gap in Governance: Acknowledging the Challenges of Organic ePortfolio Implementation. Educational Media International, 56(4), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1682271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1682271
Ndibalema, P. (2021). Online Assessment in the Era of Digital Natives in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.89 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.89
Nel, C., & Marais, E. (2020). Preservice Teachers Use of WhatsApp to Explain Subject Content to School Children during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(5), 629–641. https://www.ijwil.org/files/IJWIL_21_5_629_641.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30217-5
Nguyen, J. G., Keuseman, K. J., & Humston, J. J. (2020). Minimize Online Cheating for Online Assessments During COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3429–3435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00790
Nieminen, J. H., Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Designing the digital in authentic assessment: Is it fit for purpose? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(0), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2089627
Nikolaeva, S., & Korol, T. (2021). Prospective Philologists’ Translation Assessment Triangulation: Screen Video Recording and Think Aloud Protocol Combination. Advanced Education, 18, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.228550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.228550
Nurmikko-Fuller, T., & Hart, I. E. (2020). Constructive Alignment and Authentic Assessment in a Media-Rich Undergraduate Course. Educational Media International, 57(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1786775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1786775
Nutbrown, S., Higgins, C., & Beesley, S. (2016). Measuring the Impact of High Quality Instant Feedback on Learning. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 130–139. https://ojs.cumbria.ac.uk/index.php/prhe/article/view/318
O’Donnell, M. (2020). Assessment as and of Digital Practice: Building Productive Digital Literacies. In M. Bearman, P. Dawson, R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, & D. Boud (Eds.), Re-imagining University Assessment in a Digital World (Vol. 7, pp. 111–125). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_9
Ockey, G. J., Timpe-Laughlin, V., Davis, L., & Gu, L. (2019). Exploring the Potential of a Video-Mediated Interactive Speaking Assessment. Research Report. ETS RR-19-05. ETS Research Report Series. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12240
Ogange, B. O., Agak, J. O., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/gmbv3j DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.705
Okada, A., Noguera, I., Alexieva, L., Rozeva, A., Kocdar, S., Brouns, F., Ladonlahti, T., Whitelock, D., & Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E. (2019). Pedagogical Approaches for E-Assessment with Authentication and Authorship Verification in Higher Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3264–3282. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12733
Onodipe, G., & Ayadi, M. F. (2020). Using Smartphones for Formative Assessment in the Flipped Classroom. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 23. https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/193065.pdf
OpenAI. (2023). https://openai.com/
Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 95, 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/v7gm2
Papapanou, M., Routsi, E., Tsamakis, K., Fotis, L., Marinos, G., Lidoriki, I., Karamanou, M., Papaioannou, T. G., Tsiptsios, D., Smyrnis, N., Rizos, E., & Schizas, D. (2022). Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 98(1159), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140032
Pardo, A., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., & Mirriahi, N. (2019). Using learning analytics to scale the provision of personalised feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12592
Paris, B. (2022). Instructors’ Perspectives of Challenges and Barriers to Providing Effective Feedback. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.10.3
Pauna, M. (2017). Calculus Courses’ Assessment Data. Journal of Learning Analytics, 4(2), 12–21. https://doi.org/gmbv2k DOI: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2017.42.3
Pavlič, L., Beranič, T., Brezočnik, L., & Heričko, M. (2022). Towards a novel catalog of assessment patterns for distant education in the information technology domain. Computers & Education, 182, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104470
Pellegrino, J. W., & Quellmalz, E. S. (2010). Perspectives on the Integration of Technology and Assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/ggfh8z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782565
Penn, M., & Mavuru, L. (2020). Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Reception and Attitudes towards Virtual Laboratory Experiments in Life Sciences. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19, 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.1092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.1092
Perez-Torregrosa, A., Gallego-Arrufat, M., & Cebrian-de-la-Serna, M. (2022). Digital rubric-based assessment of oral presentation competence with technological resources for preservice teachers. Estudios Sobre Educacion, 43, 177–198. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.43.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/004.43.009
Petrovic, J., Pale, P., & Jeren, B. (2017). Online formative assessments in a digital signal processing course: Effects of feedback type and content difficulty on students learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 3047–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9571-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9571-0
Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and Alternative Assessments in ELT: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. rEFLections, 25(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v25i1.136267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v25i1.136267
Pires Pereira, I. S., Fernandes, E. L., & Flores, M. A. (2021). Teacher Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown: Insights from a Formative Intervention Approach Involving Online Feedback. Education Sciences, 11(8), 400. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080400
Pitts, W., & Lehner-Quam, A. (2019). Engaging the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education as a Lens for Assessment in an ePortfolio Social Pedagogy Ecosystem for Science Teacher Education. International Journal of ePortfolio, 9(1), 29–44. https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/IJEP/Article-PDFs/Vol-9-1/IJEP_9-1_29-44.pdf
Podsiad, M., & Havard, B. (2020). Faculty Acceptance of the Peer Assessment Collaboration Evaluation Tool: A Quantitative Study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1381–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09742-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09742-z
Porter, G. W. (2022). Collaborative Online Annotation: Pedagogy, Assessment and Platform Comparisons. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.852849 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.852849
Puentedura, R. R. (2009). Building Transformation: An Introduction to the SAMR Model. In http://hippasus.com.
Purkayastha, S., Surapaneni, A. K., Maity, P., Rajapuri, A. S., & Gichoya, J. W. (2019). Critical Components of Formative Assessment in Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Online Labs. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 17(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/gmbv2x DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/JEL.17.2.02
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507711
Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
Reedy, A., Pfitzner, D., Rook, L., & Ellis, L. (2021). Responding to the COVID-19 Emergency: Student and Academic Staff Perceptions of Academic Integrity in the Transition to Online Exams at Three Australian Universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00075-9
Reeves, T. C. (2000). Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 101–111. https://doi.org/fn39q4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/GYMQ-78FA-WMTX-J06C
Rensaa, R. J. (2023). Assessment considerations during lockdown in Norway: An exploratory case study with focus on misconducts in university mathematics. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2210456
Robertson, S. N., Humphrey, S. M., & Steele, J. P. (2019). Using Technology Tools for Formative Assessments. Journal of Educators Online, 16(2). https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2019_16_2~2/robertson_humphrey__steele DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2019.16.2.11
Rodrigues, C., Costa, J. M., & Moro, S. (2022). Assessment Patterns during Portuguese Emergency Remote Teaching. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 14(5), 3131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053131
Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Holzer, A., & Gillet, D. (2020). Instruction, Student Engagement, and Learning Outcomes: A Case Study Using Anonymous Social Media in a Face-to-Face Classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(4), 718–733. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.2995557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2020.2995557
Rolim, C., & Isaias, P. (2019). Examining the use of e-assessment in higher education: Teachers and students’ viewpoints. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1785–1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12669
Rowlett, P. (2022). Partially-automated individualized assessment of higher education mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(6), 1413–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1822554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1822554
Sa’di, R. A., Abdelraziq, A., & Sharadgah, T. A. (2021). E-Assessment at Jordan’s Universities in the Time of the COVID-19 Lockdown: Challenges and Solutions. Arab World English Journal, 37–54. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.3
Sabbaghan, S., Peglar, M., & Tweedie, M. G. (2019). The Multimodal Effects of Voice-Based Asynchronous Technology-Mediated Communication on EAP Speaking Performance. TESL Canada Journal, 36(3), 82–109. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i3.1322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v36i3.1322
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Sahin, M. (2019). Classroom Response Systems as a Formative Assessment Tool: Investigation into Students’ Perceived Usefulness and Behavioural Intention. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 6(4), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.576249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.576249
Santos, H. (2022). COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Student Grades of a University Engineering Course: A Psychometric Study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 65(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3131745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2021.3131745
Sargent, J., & Lynch, S. (2021). ’None of my other teachers know my face/emotions/thoughts’: Digital technology and democratic assessment practices in higher education physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1942972 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1942972
Sbaffi, L., & Zhao, X. (2022). Evaluating a pedagogical approach to promoting academic integrity in higher education: An online induction program. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1009305–1009305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009305
Schrum, K. (2022). Developing student capacity to produce digital scholarship in the humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 21(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222211045246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14740222211045246
Schultz, M., Young, K., K. Gunning, T., & Harvey, M. L. (2022). Defining and measuring authentic assessment: A case study in the context of tertiary science. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887811
Scott, M., & Unsworth, J. (2018). Matching final assessment to employability: Developing a digital viva as an end of programme assessment. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1510294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1510294
Selwyn, N. (2016). Minding our language: Why education and technology is full of bullshit … and what might be done about it. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(3), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523
Senel, S., & Senel, H. C. (2021). Remote Assessment in Higher Education during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.820140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.820140
Shraim, K. (2019). Online Examination Practices in Higher Education Institutions: Learners’ Perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 185–196. https://doi.org/gmbvpb DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.640588
Simper, N. (2020). Assessment thresholds for academic staff: Constructive alignment and differentiation of standards. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/gkq35c DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1718600
Slade, C., Lawrie, G., Taptamat, N., Browne, E., Sheppard, K., & Matthews, K. E. (2022). Insights into how academics reframed their assessment during a pandemic: Disciplinary variation and assessment as afterthought. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 588–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1933379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1933379
Snekalatha, S., Marzuk, S. M., Meshram, S. A., Maheswari, K. U., Sugapriya, G., & Sivasharan, K. (2021). Medical students’ perception of the reliability, usefulness and feasibility of unproctored online formative assessment tests. Advances in Physiology Education, 45(1), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00178.2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00178.2020
Song, B., Lim, K., & Kwon, H. (2021). Insights From Three Online Art Educators: Strategies for Instruction, Interaction, and Assessment. Art Education, 74(4), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.1905399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2021.1905399
Sözen, E., & Güven, U. (2019). The Effect of Online Assessments on Students’ Attitudes towards Undergraduate-Level Geography Courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/gmbv29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p1
Spector, J., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., Dona, K., Eichhorn, K., Fluck, A., Huang, R., Bridges, S., Lu, J., Ren, Y., Gui, X., Deneen, C., San Diego, J., & Gibson, D. (2016). Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment for 21st Century Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 58–71. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MSiB0MaHltuFW6bpoHPYFgPGIr9OcOZN
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. (2014). American Educational Research Association. https://www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/9780935302356.pdf
St-Onge, C., Ouellet, K., Lakhal, S., Dubé, T., & Marceau, M. (2022). COVID-19 as the tipping point for integrating e-assessment in higher education practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13169
Sucahyo, D., Hermagustiana, I., & Rusmawaty, D. (2022). Students’ Online Assessments in Higher Education Context: Indonesian Teacher Educators’ Voice. Script Journal, 7(2), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v7i2.1090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v7i2.1090
Sudakova, N., Savina, T., Masalimova, A., Mikhaylovsky, M., Karandeeva, L., & Zhdanov, S. (2022). Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: Bibliometric Analysis. Education Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030209
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
Tailab, M. M. K., & Marsh, N. Y. (2020). Use of Self-Assessment of Video Recording to Raise Students’ Awareness of Development of Their Oral Presentation Skills. Higher Education Studies, 10(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n1p16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n1p16
Tejaswi, P., Venkatramaphanikumar, S., & Venkata Krishna Kishore, K. (2023). Proctor net: An AI framework for suspicious activity detection in online proctored examinations. Measurement : Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 206, 112266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112266
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Calls_to_Action_English2.pdf
Thibodeaux, T., Harapnuik, D., Cummings, C., & Dolce, J. (2020). Graduate Students’ Perceptions of Factors That Contributed to ePortfolios Persistence beyond the Program of Study. International Journal of ePortfolio, 10(1), 19–32. https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/IJEP/Article-PDFs/Vol-10-1/IJEP_10-1_19-32.pdf
Thompson, C. J. (2009). Educational Statistics Authentic Learning CAPSULES: Community Action Projects for Students Utilizing Leadership and E-based Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2009.11889508
Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/gftz95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
Tsai, N. W. (2016). Assessment of Students’ Learning Behavior and Academic Misconduct in a Student-Pulled Online Learning and Student-Governed Testing Environment: A Case Study. Journal of Education for Business, 91(7), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1238808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1238808
Tsai, Y.-S., Perrotta, C., & Gaševic, D. (2020). Empowering Learners with Personalised Learning Approaches? Agency, Equity and Transparency in the Context of Learning Analytics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396
Valizadeh, M. (2022). Cheating in online learning programs: Learners’ perceptions and solutions. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE, 23(1), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1050394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1050394
Veale, C. G. L. (2022). Considering the Impact of Image-Based Search Engines for Online Chemistry Assessments. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01075
Venville, A., Cleak, H., & Bould, E. (2017). Exploring the potential of a collaborative web-based e-portfolio in social work field education. Australian Social Work, 70(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2017.1278735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2017.1278735
Vick, N. (2021). The Video Essay. Honors in Practice, 17, 252–254. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nchchip/357/
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.; A. R. Luria, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Wang, P., & Jeffrey, R. (2017). Listening to learners: An investigation into college students’ attitudes towards the adoption of e-portfolios in English assessment and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1451–1463. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12513
Watson, C., Wilson, A., Drew, V., & Thompson, T. L. (2017). Small data, online learning and assessment practices in higher education: A case study of failure? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1030–1045. https://doi.org/ggrgxn DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1223834
Way, K. A., Burrell, L., D’Allura, L., & Ashford-Rowe, K. (2021). Empirical investigation of authentic assessment theory: An application in online courses using mimetic simulation created in university learning management ecosystems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1740647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1740647
WEF. (2020). The Future of Jobs Report 2020. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/
Weir, I., Gwynllyw, R., & Henderson, K. (2021). A Case Study in the E-Assessment of Statistics for Non-Specialists. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.1.5
West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the Assessment Experience: Improving Student Perceptions, Engagement and Understanding Using Online Video Feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954
Whitelock, D., Edwards, C., & Okada, A. (2020). Can e-Authentication Raise the Confidence of Both Students and Teachers in Qualifications Granted through the e-Assessment Process? Journal of Learning for Development, 7(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i1.384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i1.384
Wilkie, B., & Liefeith, A. (2022). Student experiences of live synchronised video feedback in formative assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1725879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1725879
Wilson, C. B., Slade, C., Kirby, M. M., Downer, T., Fisher, M. B., & Nuessler, S. (2018). Digital Ethics and the Use of ePortfolio: A Scoping Review of the Literature. International Journal of ePortfolio, 8(2), 115–125. https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/IJEP/Article-PDFs/Vol-8-2/IJEP-8.2-115-125.pdf
Woldeab, D., & Brothen, T. (2019). 21st Century Assessment: Online Proctoring, Test Anxiety, and Student Performance. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1). https://dgmg81phhvh63.cloudfront.net/content/user-photos/IJEP/Article-PDFs/Vol-8-2/IJEP-8.2-115-125.pdf
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Xu, H. (2022). Interactive Self-Reporting as Behavioural Cue Elicitor for Online-Classroom Assessment. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070232
Xu, X., Kauer, S., & Tupy, S. (2016). Multiple-choice questions: Tips for optimizing assessment in-seat and online. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000062
Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). The Role of e-Portfolios in Supporting Productive Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276–1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12316
Zheng, C., Wang, L., & Chai, C. (2021). Self-assessment first or peer-assessment first: Effects of video-based formative practice on learners’ English public speaking anxiety and performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1946562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1946562
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Colin Madland, Valerie Irvine, Chris DeLuca, Okan Bulut
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to the OTESSA Journal agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the OTESSA Journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in the OTESSA Journal.
