Developing the Technology-Integrated Assessment Framework




assessment, technology, digital learning, technology-integrated assessment, Indigenous education, framework, higher education, educational technology


The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of a new framework for understanding technology-integrated assessment in higher education based on a review of the literature using the assessment design in a digital world framework (Bearman et al., 2022) as a lens. Our review (Madland et al., 2024) revealed both congruities and incongruities between the literature and the framework, leading to the need for further work to accurately conceptualize technology-integrated assessment. In this article, we contribute to the literature on technology-integrated assessment in higher education by proposing the technology-integrated assessment framework. This paper marks an important step in extending our understanding of the factors influencing instructors who integrate technology into their assessment practice and promoting ethical and equitable approaches to technology-integrated assessment in higher education.


Abrahart, R. (2023, June 12). Rejection of legal duty of care marks a bad day for students’ rights. Wonkhe.

Alexander v University of Lethbridge. (2022).

Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 174673–174686. DOI:

Aluko, F. R., & Omidire, M. F. (2020). A critical review of student assessment practices in distance education in an emerging economy: Benchmarking practices against policy. Africa Education Review, 17(5), 76–94. DOI:

Baniasadi, A., Salehi, K., Khodaie, E., Bagheri Noaparast, K., & Izanloo, B. (2023). Fairness in Classroom Assessment: A Systematic Review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 91–109. DOI:

BC Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Training. (2022). Digital Learning Advisory Committee Draft Recommendations.

BC Teachers’ Council. (2019). Professional Standards for BC Educators.

Bearman, M., Nieminen, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Designing assessment in a digital world: An organising framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3). DOI:

Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682. DOI:

Biasutti, M. (2017). A coding scheme to analyse the online asynchronous discussion forums of university students. Technology Pedagogy And Education, 26(5), 601–615. DOI:

Birch, A., & Irvine, V. (2009). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model. Educational Media International, 46(4), 295–315. DOI:

Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. DOI:

Celik, I., Gedrimiene, E., Silvola, A., & Muukkonen, H. (2022). Response of learning analytics to the online education challenges during pandemic: Opportunities and key examples in higher education. Policy Futures In Education. DOI:

Cleveland-Innes, M., & Emes, C. (2005). Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. NASPA Journal, 42, 241–262. DOI:

Combrinck, M., & Vollenhoven, W. van. (2020). Computer-assisted assessment: An old remedy for challenges in open distance learning. Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 22–34.

Dawson, P. (2020). Defending Assessment Security in a Digital World: Preventing E-Cheating and Supporting Academic Integrity in Higher Education (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI:

DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Approaches to classroom assessment inventory: A new instrument to support teacher assessment literacy. Educational Assessment, 21, 248–266. DOI:

Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., & Carless, D. (2018). Students’ conceptions of eportfolios as assessment and technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(4), 487–496. DOI:

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

Dron, J. (2022). Educational technology: what it is and how it works. AI & Society, 37(1), 155–166. DOI:

Duncan, A., & Joyner, D. (2022). On the necessity (or lack thereof) of digital proctoring: Drawbacks, perceptions, and alternatives. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(5), 1482–1496. DOI:

Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning (2nd edition). Corwin Press.

Fawns, T., & Nieminen, J. H. (2023). The only way is ethics: A dialogue of assessment and social good (L. Czerniewicz & C. Cronin, Eds.; 1st ed., pp. 533–554). Open Book Publishers. DOI:

Gallavan, N., Huffman, S., & Shaw, E. (2017). Ensuring Ethics and Equity With Classroom Assessments and Mobile Technology: Advancing Online Education. In M. Mills & D. Wake (Eds.), Empowering Learners With Mobile Open-Access Learning Initiatives (pp. 220–241). DOI:

Gamage, K. A. A., Pradeep, R. G. G. R., & Silva, E. K. de. (2022). Rethinking assessment: The future of examinations in higher education. Sustainability, 14(6), 3552. DOI:

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105. DOI:

Gilliard, C., & Selwyn, N. (2023). Automated surveillance in education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 195–205. DOI:

Harris, L. D., & Wasilewski, J. (2004). Indigeneity, an alternative worldview: four R’s (relationship, responsibility, reciprocity, redistribution) vs. two P’s (power and profit). Sharing the journey towards conscious evolution. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21(5), 489–503. DOI:

Hilliger, I., Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Alexandron, G., & Gašević, D. (2022). Trustworthy remote assessments: A typology of pedagogical and technological strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. DOI:

hooks, bell. (1994). Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.

Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change (B. Bell, J. Gaventa, & J. Peters, Eds.). Temple University Press.

Hussein, M. J., Yusuf, J., Deb, A. S., Fong, L., & Naidu, S. (2020). An evaluation of online proctoring tools. Open Praxis, 12(4), 509–525. DOI:

Kirkness, V. J., & Barnhardt, R. (1991). First nations and higher education: The four r’s– respect, relevance, reciprocity, responsibility. Journal of American Indian Education, 30(3), 1–15.

Lake, J., & Atkins, H. (2021). Facilitating online learning with the 5R’s. BCcampus.

Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (Dis)Course: A Distinctive Social Justice Aligned Definition of Open Education. Journal of Learning for Development - JL4D, 5(3). DOI:

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2003). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI:

Madland, C., Irvine, V., DeLuca, C., & Bulut, O. (2024). Technology-integrated assessment: A literature review. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 4(1), 1-42. DOI:

Massey, K. D., DeLuca, C., & LaPointe-McEwan, D. (2020). Assessment Literacy in College Teaching: Empirical Evidence on the Role and Effectiveness of a Faculty Training Course. To Improve the Academy, 39(1). DOI:

Moorhouse, B., & Kohnke, L. (2022). Conducting formative assessment during synchronous online lessons: University teachers’ challenges and pedagogical strategies. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 18(3). DOI:

Nadarajah, S. (2021). Student Suicide on-Campus: Tort Liability of Canadian Universities and Determining a Duty of Care. Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform, 26, 97–120.

Nieminen, J. H., & Carless, D. (2022). Feedback literacy: A critical review of an emerging concept. Higher Education, 85, 1381–1400. DOI:

Nutbrown, S., Higgins, C., & Beesley, S. (2016). Measuring the impact of high quality instant feedback on learning. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 10(1), 130–139.

OpenAI. (2023).

Or, C., & Chapman, E. (2022). Development and validation of an instrument to measure online assessment acceptance in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(4), 977–997. DOI:

Pires Pereira, I. S., Fernandes, E. L., & Flores, M. A. (2021). Teacher education during the COVID-19 lockdown: Insights from a formative intervention approach involving online feedback. Education Sciences, 11(8), 400. DOI:

Restoule, J.-P. (2008). The five R’s of Indigenous research: Relationship, respect, relevance, responsibility, and reciprocity. [Paper presentation]. Wise Practices II: Canadian Aboriginal AIDS Network Research and Capacity Building Conference, Toronto

Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Holzer, A., & Gillet, D. (2020). Instruction, student engagement, and learning outcomes: A case study using anonymous social media in a face-to-face classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(4), 718–733. DOI:

Sargent, J., & Lynch, S. (2021). ’None of my other teachers know my face/emotions/thoughts’: Digital technology and democratic assessment practices in higher education physical education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(5), 693–705. DOI:

Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604. DOI:

Styres, S. D., & Zinga, D. M. (2013). The community-first land-centred theoretical framework: Bringing a" good mind" to indigenous education research? Canadian Journal of Education, 36(2).

Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2022). Promoting equity and social justice through assessment for inclusion. In R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, D. Boud, & T. Jorre De St Jorre (Eds.), Assessment for Inclusion in Higher Education: Promoting Equity and Social Justice in Assessment (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI:

Tessaro, D., Restoule, J.-P., Gaviria, P., Flessa, J., Lindeman, C., & Scully-Stewart, C. (2018). The five r’s for indigenizing online learning: A case study of the first nations schools’ principals course. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 40(1), 125–143.

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

Thompson, C. J. (2009). Educational statistics authentic learning CAPSULES: Community action projects for students utilizing leadership and e-based statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1). DOI:

Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. DOI:

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. DOI:

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

Woo, S. E., LeBreton, J. M., Keith, M. G., & Tay, L. (2023). Bias, Fairness, and Validity in Graduate-School Admissions: A Psychometric Perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(1), 3–31. DOI:

Yang, M., Tai, M., & Lim, C. P. (2016). The role of e-portfolios in supporting productive learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1276–1286. DOI:




How to Cite

Madland, C., Irvine, V., DeLuca, C., & Bulut, O. (2024). Developing the Technology-Integrated Assessment Framework. The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal, 4(1), 1–19.



Research Articles